Romania , op. cit. , § 58; Botten v. Norway , judgment of 19   February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I, §   50).

On 17 August 1994, the Federal Court dismissed both the applicant's public-law appeal and her appeal on grounds of nullity.

Its recommendation was that the requests of both the applicant companies and Mr Wouterse be dismissed.

  In both cases the applicants contended that their criminal convictions had infringed their right to freedom of expression and violated Article 10.

Both are members of the travelling community.

The first opinion stated that the living conditions in both homes were suitable for the children.

The investigation commenced and both applicants were questioned. On 8 and 10 February 2009 both were granted victim status.

March, 1965, the Berlin Regional Court heard the case, both parties being represented by legal Counsel.

Both applicants are members of the National Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Association LGL (hereinafter – “the LGL Association”).

On 27 November 1979, the records noted that both girls were still bedwetting and carpet wetting.

However, the medical findings recorded in both cases had indicated only smaller abrasions and bruises.

One knock may have affected the area of both wrists, almost certainly as a result of handcuffing.

In a letter dated 13 June 2002, the Superintendent Registrar stated that under the relevant domestic legislation, it would be impossible for the applicants to marry unless A and C were both dead: “...

that both of them had been equally responsible for the dissolution of the marriage.

/01/2021), and (ii) on 02/02/2021 for the same purpose,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both

However, it was essential for both the parents and the child that visiting contact were not discontinued completely. 42.

The opinion also stated that both parents had limited parenting capacities but were equally suitable to be awarded custody and that they had both been manipulating the children, who needed psychological

Efforts were being made in both transit zones to provide children with organised activities.

The first applicant brought the application on behalf of both applicants. Both applicants live in Pleven. Background 5.