According to her, she had done so in order to defend herself against some inhabitants of her village who often insulted her because of her mental illness.

    The County Court had not found that Ashers cancelled the order because of the applicant’s actual or perceived sexual orientation, but because they opposed same sex marriage.

The duty judge, in a decision delivered on the same day, declared the habeas corpus application inadmissible because the committal had been approved by a judge and because it was unknown whether the impossibility

   The applicants argued that the disputed interference was not "prescribed by law", because it was not foreseeable.

The resulting report stated that because of the incident of 20 March 2009 and the institution of criminal proceedings in that connection, as well as because of the media coverage of the case, it had been

A hearing listed for 8 February 1993 was cancelled because the applicant failed to appear.

However, the court could not have ordered the accused to pay damages because in the present case it never had an injured party, and no one made a civil claim ...

O.B. declared that he knew the signs of being under drug influence because he had been a drug user himself. 50 .

Since the father is free every fourth day, because he works for three whole days, he is always free on one day of the week.

If forced to return to Morocco, he would risk being imprisoned because he was from Western Sahara and because of the people he had socialised with while in Sweden. 10.

Investigation of case no. 1056 [medical negligence] was also held back because of significant failures.

It was adjourned because some of the defendants failed to attend it. 31.

Today he is reported to have punched pupil I.M. on the left cheek because I.M. threw his cap at him.

On 23 June 2011 [the applicant] sought the discontinuance of the criminal investigation because of the expiry of the limitation period.

The applicants obtained rights to property restoration not because their or their relatives’ property had been nationalised by the Soviet regime, but because they had bought those rights from G.O., after

invoked by the applicant because he had prior to the trial expressly renounced challenging these judges.

This is not the case with the present request because it cannot be decided multilaterally, given that it concerns an allocated debt.

In addition, the Government argued that the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies because they had not made representations to the Minister as to why they should not be deported and because

Because of this agreement, the proceedings in respect of contact rights were suspended pending a final decision in the divorce proceedings. 20.