CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-674
21 décembre 2010
Preliminary objection dismissed (victim);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Art. 5-1;Non-pecuniary damage - award
Page 95 sur 11941
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD002818904
Therefore, it dismisses this objection of the Government concerning the victim status of Ms Ichina and Ms Dmitriyeva. III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 27.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2265
12 février 2008
Preliminary objection dismissed (applicability);Violation of Art. 10;Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (global)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD002029402
6 décembre 2007
Preliminary objection (incompatibility ratione materiae) dismissed;Remainder inadmissible;Violation of P1-1;Just satisfaction reserved
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD002633895
20 juillet 2004
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);Violation of P1-1;Just satisfaction reserved
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617JUD001185504
17 juin 2008
Preliminary objection dismissed (six month period);Violation of Art. 5-3;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CEDH:002-9559
26 février 1993
GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION Failure to exhaust domestic remedies – basis of the objection the fact that applicant did not appeal against pretore ’s decision and did not avail himself of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0226JUD001339687
THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTION 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022JUD002189093
22 octobre 1997
Conclusion : objection dismissed (unanimously). B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0715JUD006328500
15 juillet 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116JUD002142293
16 novembre 2000
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion);No violation of Art. 2;No violation of Art. 3
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1013JUD006363300
13 octobre 2005
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic proceedings);Violation of P1-1;Just satisfaction reserved
ECLI:CEDH:002-7840
Government’s preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Objection that applicant had omitted to rely on Law no. 466 of 7 May 1964 and had not instituted proceedings in Turkish courts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0420JUD001432788
20 avril 1993
THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011JUD005600200
11 octobre 2005
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion);Violation of Art. 5-3;Violation of Art. 5-4
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0423JUD003100102
23 avril 2009
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed;Violation of P7-2;Non-pecuniary damage - award
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0423JUD002288593
23 avril 1998
the Government’s preliminary objection 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0802JUD002352994
2 août 2001
Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies);No violation of P1-1
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0205JUD004358806
5 février 2009
Admissibility The Government’s objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies 19.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9664
Both preliminary objections raised issues closely linked to merits - Government's plea joined to merits. II.