CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124DEC001715503
24 janvier 2008
And the trials themselves, a pure formality: the outcome is a foregone conclusion as the so-called terrorists are obviously a threat to public order; the volume of the case files shows how serious the
Page 95 sur 114
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510JUD003347508
10 mai 2011
However, the Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s application for compensation, reiterating that on 16 June 2005 he had been convicted of forgery, for which he had been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203DEC004001004
3 décembre 2009
inspectorate no. 4 of the Yamalo-Nenetskiy Region to have their taxpayers' numbers cancelled on the ground that the numbers “had been assigned to them through ignorance... because that number is a forerunner
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD004897409
30 mai 2017
On 16 September 2009 the charges against the applicant were finalised to include twenty-six counts of bribe-taking and forgery of official documents under Articles 290 §
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC006404710
24 mai 2016
The certificate of loss of documents ( attestation de perte des pièces ) submitted by her was found to be a forgery.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3187520-3560858
8 juillet 2010
Relying on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security), he complains about the excessive length of his detention awaiting trial on suspicion of financial fraud and forgery.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923JUD003392903
23 septembre 2010
had substantiated their refutation of the above allegations with reference to statements made by public officials issued in the domain of their competence and being aware of criminal liability for forgery
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD003301506
5 octobre 2017
On 3 October 2001 a criminal case was opened in respect of suspected forgery of the lease contract of 12 January 1999, without being targeted against any particular persons. 11.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0224JUD002976805
24 février 2009
Forgione, avocat à Telese Terme. Le gouvernement italien (« le Gouvernement ») a été représenté successivement par ses agents, MM. I.M. Braguglia et R. Adam et Mme E.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401JUD003871306
1 avril 2008
There were 57 defendants in the case, all charged with numerous counts of attempted murder, extortion, robbery, drug trafficking, theft, illegal possession of firearms, battery and forgery committed in
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2357959-2545079
20 mai 2008
In May 1993 the applicant was questioned concerning an accusation against him of forgery.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC001564406
5 novembre 2013
On an unspecified date the applicant was charged with forgery.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1122JUD000183710
22 novembre 2018
On 7 August 2007 the investigator decided to start an investigation on account of forgery. 14.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002079192
2 septembre 1994
On 21 April 1988 the applicant was questioned by an officer of the Special Control Department on the suspicion of having committed forgery within the meaning of Section
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD001271706
18 janvier 2011
He was later also charged with forgery of an official document. A prosecutor imposed a remand measure on the applicant pending further action – the obligation not to leave his place of residence. 10.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1048088-1089587
15 juillet 2004
He was the subject of a number of administrative investigations and of criminal proceedings for forgery and using forged documents after he and other doctors were suspected of having forged prescriptions
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114696
31 août 2011
Court by the applicant before communication); (e) application lodged by the applicant in which he requested that criminal proceedings should be brought in connection with alleged forgery
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC000448803
28 septembre 2010
As she did not comply with the summons, on 25 July 2002, the prosecutor attached to the Prahova Court of Appeal issued a pre-trial arrest warrant for thirty days for alleged fraud and incitement to forgery
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC004022998
15 juin 1999
Both he and his wife had had to resort to acts of forgery to conceal their identities and whereabouts in Iran for fear of persecution and their children’s birth certificates had been obtained by bribing
ECLI:CEDH:001-153725
19 mars 2015
The courier and her husband had had no reason to commit post embezzlement and forgery of documents.