CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 269 résultats pour « Forgeron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124DEC001715503

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2008

24 janvier 2008

And the trials themselves, a pure formality: the outcome is a foregone conclusion as the so-called terrorists are obviously a threat to public order; the volume of the case files shows how serious the

Page 95 sur 114

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510JUD003347508

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2011

10 mai 2011

    However, the Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s application for compensation, reiterating that on 16   June 2005 he had been convicted of   forgery, for which he had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203DEC004001004

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

inspectorate no. 4 of the Yamalo-Nenetskiy Region to have their taxpayers' numbers cancelled on the ground that the numbers “had been assigned to them through ignorance... because that number is a forerunner

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD004897409

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2017

30 mai 2017

    On 16 September 2009 the charges against the applicant were finalised to include twenty-six counts of bribe-taking and forgery of official documents under Articles   290   §  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC006404710

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

The certificate of loss of documents ( attestation de perte des pièces ) submitted by her was found to be a forgery.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3187520-3560858

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2010

8 juillet 2010

Relying on Article   5   §   3 (right to liberty and security), he complains about the excessive length of his detention awaiting trial on suspicion of financial fraud and forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923JUD003392903

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2010

23 septembre 2010

had substantiated their refutation of the above allegations with reference to statements made by public officials issued in the domain of their competence and being aware of criminal liability for forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1005JUD003301506

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2017

5 octobre 2017

    On 3 October 2001 a criminal case was opened in respect of suspected forgery of the lease contract of 12 January 1999, without being targeted against any particular persons. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0224JUD002976805

Admin. suprême

24 février 2009

24 février 2009

Forgione, avocat à Telese Terme. Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») a été représenté successivement par ses agents, MM. I.M. Braguglia et R.   Adam et Mme   E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401JUD003871306

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2008

1 avril 2008

There were 57 defendants in the case, all charged with numerous counts of attempted murder, extortion, robbery, drug trafficking, theft, illegal possession of firearms, battery and forgery committed in

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2357959-2545079

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

  In May 1993 the applicant was questioned concerning an accusation against him of forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC001564406

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2013

5 novembre 2013

    On an unspecified date the applicant was charged with forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1122JUD000183710

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2018

22 novembre 2018

    On 7 August 2007 the investigator decided to start an investigation on account of forgery. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002079192

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 1994

2 septembre 1994

        On 21 April 1988 the applicant was questioned by an officer of the Special Control Department on the suspicion of having committed forgery within the meaning of Section

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD001271706

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2011

18 janvier 2011

He was later also charged with forgery of an official document. A prosecutor imposed a remand measure on the applicant pending further action – the obligation not to leave his place of residence. 10.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1048088-1089587

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2004

15 juillet 2004

He was the subject of a number of administrative investigations and of criminal proceedings for forgery and using forged documents after he and other doctors were suspected of having forged prescriptions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-114696

Admin. suprême

31 août 2011

31 août 2011

Court by the applicant before communication);   (e)     application lodged by the applicant in which he requested that criminal proceedings should be brought in connection with alleged forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC000448803

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

As she did not comply with the summons, on 25 July 2002, the prosecutor attached to the Prahova Court of Appeal issued a pre-trial arrest warrant for thirty days for alleged fraud and incitement to forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC004022998

Admin. suprême

15 juin 1999

15 juin 1999

Both he and his wife had had to resort to acts of forgery to conceal their identities and whereabouts in Iran for fear of persecution and their children’s birth certificates had been obtained by bribing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153725

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2015

19 mars 2015

The courier and her husband had had no reason to commit post embezzlement and forgery of documents.

Source officielle