Should the applicant’s request to examine R. and S. be considered as a request for examination of witnesses against him or on his behalf?

    Was the applicant able to examine the witnesses against him and have examined those on his behalf as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention?

Accordingly, in accordance with its case-law, the Court held that Ziya Ergezen’s widow and children had a legitimate interest in pursuing the application on his behalf.

On 19 February 2005 the applicant read a press statement on behalf of a number of non-governmental organisations and the DEHAP (Democratic People’s Party) in Kars.

#xa0; » des régions connues sous l’appellation «   territoires au-delà du Boug   » – lesquels n’appartenaient plus à la Pologne et comprennent à présent certaines parties du territoire du Bélarus

measures declared null and void, relying on Article L.153-1 of the Monetary and Finance Code, which provides that: (i) assets “held or handled” by foreign central banks “on their own account or on behalf

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

The representative was invited to submit by 17   April 2020 any written observations he wished to make in reply on behalf of the applicant, together with any claims for just satisfaction.

    Was the applicant able to examine the witnesses against him and have examined those on his behalf as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention?

  PRELIMINARY OBSERVATION It was not disputed that, following the applicant's death, his widow and two children were entitled to pursue the application on his behalf and Court saw no reason to hold

On 18   August 2009 the Erzurum Assize Court with special jurisdiction found the applicant guilty of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to four terms

Respect for private life Failure to provide alleged father of child with adequate opportunity to give evidence in person: violation Facts – In March 2002 the applicant’s former wife brought a claim on behalf

On 20 February 2006 the Adana Assize Court with special jurisdiction found the applicant guilty of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organization under Article   7 §   2 of

relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber On 19 November 2018, acting in his own name and, in his capacity as mayor of a municipality situated on the English Channel coast, in the name of and on behalf

the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the Government’s observations were forwarded to the applicant’s lawyer, who was invited to submit by 14   April 2023 the observations on behalf

SECTION Application no. 1508/24 Manuela NOGALES DE LA MORENA against Spain lodged on 4 January 2024 communicated on 16 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE On 16 May 2018 the applicant, acting on behalf

    Were the applicants able to examine the witnesses against them and have examined those on their behalf as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention?

    Acting on behalf of his client, in November 2020 the applicant submitted before the Supreme Court a request that, until resolution of the inheritance dispute which was pending before them

under Article 6 of other shortcomings in the criminal proceedings against him (he was unable to examine at trial a number of prosecution witnesses; the trial court refused to hear two witnesses on his behalf