Moreover, the court observed that the applicant’s arguments in respect of her wider freedom of expression were beyond the point because the disciplinary tribunal was only concerned with the applicant’s

  According to the Government, he was arrested because information was received by the RUC from a usually reliable source which indicated that he was a member of a PIRA bombing team.

He recommended that no disciplinary action be taken against the officers because there had been no appearance of abuse of power in respect of the applicant.

I did not know Chember very well because he was not from my platoon ...” 22 .

  The principle of proportionality was allegedly violated in several respects, in particular because the search warrant was not directed against the applicant herself, because it dated back almost

    In the meantime, hearings set for 18 June and 3 July 1997, had been cancelled; the former because J.S., one of the applicant's co-defendants, had failed to appear, the latter because the

On 25 May 1991 it decided to refer the case to the plenary court because of the important issues it raised.

The doctors treated the wounds and sent her home, because there was no room in the hospital.

On that day the hearing was adjourned because the applicant had not been brought to the courthouse. 16.

    The State responded that his action was time-barred because the three-year limitation period for employment-related claims had expired. 9.

They had taken those measures because they considered that it was their duty to help their daughter in view of the negative reports they had heard about MISA. 28.

She had done so because at the time she had been raising a small child on her own.

The three scheduled hearings (14   June 2004, 16-17 September 2004 and 18 January 2005) were adjourned because of the presiding judge’s other commitments and/or because one or more of the defendants

It held that the ban against V.V. had been put in place not only because he was infected with HIV but also because he had refused to give contact details of his former partners during an “epidemiological

In her appeal she argued that the applicants had been deprived of effective legal assistance because from 14 December 2004 she had not been able to participate in the hearings because of the constant disorder

He had not been opposed to receiving such protection because several other persons had been “provoking” him as well.

The plaintiff will not be able to obtain reconstruction assistance because the Reconstruction Act does not apply to pecuniary damage to business premises. ...

    The Court concludes that because J.

Unfortunately, because of recent amendments to the Media Act, the newspaper may not name the young rascals or their parents and relatives ...