(1) - unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant   35155/21* 25/06/2021 Dmitriy

6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO. 3,500   75327/17 19/10/2017 Dmitriy

    33106/24 25/07/2022 Dmytro Viktorovych ZAGOROVSKYY 1987   Dmytro Viktorovych Zagorovskyy, 1987, the applicant Stanislav, Kherson region 26/03/2022 On 26/03/2022 at approximatively 2

Voronezh Region   4. 60946/14 24/08/2014 Natalya Yevgenyevna KUZNETSOVA 02/09/1974 Ostashkov, the Tver Region   5. 55084/17 24/07/2017 Vladimir Nikolayevich STEPANOV 17/11/1949 St Petersburg Dmitriy

of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 3,500     16587/22 08/03/2022 Andrey Mikhaylovich GOLOSOV 1987 Zubarev Dmitriy

      43669/21 12/08/2021 Dmitriy Gennadyevich YEFIMOV 1987 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Cheboksary   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

center; page-break-after:avoid } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sF5C1637F { margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FIRST SECTION Application no. 21302/10 Dmitriy

08/01/2019 Fanis Gabbasovich NURULLIN 1965 Vtorushin Nikolay Aleksandrovich Tyumen Nizhnekamsk Town Court; Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 18/12/2018   7,500   7757/19 23/01/2019 Dmitriy

impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings 3,500     80358/17 10/11/2017 Dmitriy

  7576/23 06/02/2023 Dmitriy Ivanovich GOLOVIN 1990     Anti-war protest   Moscow   06/03/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 12,000 Moscow City Court 05/10/2022 (received

unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021 4,000     54360/21 20/10/2021 Dmitriy

imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. 5,000     54546/19 09/10/2019 Maksim Igorevich NAUMOV 1999 Zakhvatov Dmitriy

/2007          26074/08 06/02/2008 Anatoliy Semenovich BABCHUK 1941 Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/01/2002          35999/08 16/07/2008 Dmytro

of Witness absent from trial (indicated by initials)   Summary of the nature of the witness evidence Reasons for absence Steps taken to compensate for the witnesses’ absence 13175/18 14/02/2018 Dmitriy

Petersburg 03/12/2019 amphetamine fellow drug user, anonymous/unverified tip, lack of incriminating information, repeated calls St Petersburg City Court, 26/02/2020     43483/20 21/05/2020 Dmitriy

location Penalty Date of final domestic decision Name of court Amount awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1] 2276/21 06/12/2020 Dmitriy

(non-pecuniary damage to each applicant); plus 55,979.2 Russian roubles (RUB) (pecuniary damage to each applicant)             36841/08 24/06/2008 Dmitriy

display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block }       FIRST SECTION         CASE OF DMITRIY

applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14   May   2020 as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry