rapporteure, - les conclusions de Mme Gavalda, rapporteure publique, - les observations de Me Dartier, représentant les consorts H..., en la présence de M. et Mme E..., - les observations de Me Behague

Alleging medical negligence, her parents brought judicial proceedings on her behalf against the State. The district court found that the State was liable and awarded the applicant compensation.

On the same day a lawyer was assigned to represent the child and made an unsuccessful application for asylum on her behalf.

The applicant was dismissed from his job as an environmental engineer with the Lübeck municipality after issuing a press release on behalf of a right-wing extremist group on the day following the terrorist

Pursuant to a decision taken in July 1986 by the military authority on whose behalf the work was performed, the State refused to pay for part of the work that had been carried out on the orders of the

The complaints submitted by Alain Vaudelle on his own behalf were declared inadmissible.

In 1990 the trustee initiated civil proceedings against the State on behalf of the company, claiming that its bankruptcy had been caused by a criminal investigation which had been retrospectively invalidated

Further medical evidence was filed on his behalf, some within 28 days and some later.

The applicants initiated proceedings in the Sheriff Court, claiming damages on behalf of the third applicant on account of, inter alia , the prison staff’s negligence.

préjuge en rien de l’évaluation par le Comité des mesures générales relatives au problème de la non-acceptation des demandes d’asile et du refus d’entrée aux étrangers entrant en Pologne en provenance du Bélarus

Acting on the applicant’s behalf, a public prosecutor lodged an appeal on points of law with the Senate of the Supreme Court.

THE LAW The Court first notes that the second applicant as the only heir of the first applicant wished to continue the present proceedings on behalf of her late mother and finds that there are no obstacles

His mother acts on his behalf as the guardian, brining complaints before the Court and alleging authorities’ failure to protect her son’s health and physical integrity.

On 24   April 2008 İzmir Assize Court found the applicant guilty of the offence of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organization under Article   7 §   2 of the Prevention

The application was also lodged on behalf of the applicant’s two minor children. The Dutch Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R.A.A.

    On the same day the applicant’s representative confirmed the settlement in the following terms: “I hereby notice the court on behalf of my client that Mrs.

A state-appointed lawyer was present in the courtroom and made submissions to the court on the applicant’s behalf.

when the direct victim dies after the application was lodged with the Court, the applicant’s heirs may pursue the application provided that they have legitimate interest in maintaining the request on behalf