CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-116389
6 décembre 2012
Measures General measures The Government considers no further general measures are necessary because
Page 94 sur 1499
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10560
27 octobre 1994
There had been an interference because mere approval of land-use plan sufficient to limit applicant's exercise of his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217532
3 mai 2022
This was so not because that was the date when they had inherited the property (as argued by the State) given that they also inherited their ancestor’s property rights, but rather because that was the
ECLI:CEDH:002-345
18 octobre 2011
The storage of data concerning the applicant’s private life, including her profession, and the retention thereof, amounted to an interference within the meaning of Article 8, because it was personal
ECLI:CEDH:002-11597
25 juillet 2017
However, he was denied leave to appeal after the court of appeal noted that, because he had admitted the circumstances of the offence at his trial, he was precluded by Article 394 § 2 of
ECLI:CEDH:001-242114
30 janvier 2025
It also argued that it had been placed at a disadvantage vis-à-vis the Finnish company because the Finnish tax authorities did not keep record of tax debts below EUR 10,000, and because the managers of
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230970
13 décembre 2023
information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)1383 ); Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because
ECLI:CEDH:001-228717
18 octobre 2023
information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)702 ); Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because
ECLI:CEDH:001-244744
8 août 2025
She further complains under Article 8 of the Convention that following her dismissal her private life was adversely affected, and under Article 14 of the Convention that she was dismissed because of having
ECLI:CEDH:001-230015
15 décembre 2023
Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicant complains that the proceedings concerning the refusal to renew her security clearance were unfair because the SAC has not exercised sufficient judicial
ECLI:CEDH:001-244918
3 septembre 2025
information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2025)638 ); Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709DEC005305615
9 juillet 2019
It did not award any compensation for non-pecuniary damage because the applicant had failed to make such a claim.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249667
17 mars 2026
xa0; The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that the searches of his car and of him personally were: (a) not surrounded by sufficient safeguards against arbitrariness because
ECLI:CEDH:001-169412
10 novembre 2016
Relying on evidential material from the pre-investigation inquiry the court agreed that K.L. had committed suicide because of problems in his relationship with his girlfriend and not because of alleged
JU Chambre Sociale
DTA_2408755_20250130
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés le 3 septembre 2024, et le 22 octobre 2024, Mme B C épouse D, représentée par Me Tatiana Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'admettre
1ère chambre
DTA_2410359_20250408
8 avril 2025
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés le 15 octobre 2024 et le 18 octobre 2024, Mme C B épouse A, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124DEC001184121
24 janvier 2023
Government objected, firstly, that the applicant was no longer at risk of extradition and thus could not claim to be a victim of the alleged violation and, secondly, that the application was inadmissible because
ECLI:CEDH:001-110671
20 mars 2012
September 2007 the expert submitted, after examining the brother and the son – but not the applicant, who refused to co-operate –, that the applicant’s participation in the boy’s life was harmful, notably because
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-687174-694682
6 février 2003
On 9 April 2002 Moscow City Court set aside their conviction and discharged them from serving their sentence because the time-limit for establishing their criminal liability had expired.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC004008398
21 mars 2002
COMPLAINTS The applicant complain that British social security legislation discriminates against her because she is the surviving spouse of a polygamous marriage.