CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 963 résultats pour « Bechaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-116389

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2012

6 décembre 2012

Measures                   General measures   The Government considers no further general measures are necessary because

Source officielle

Page 94 sur 1499

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10560

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 1994

27 octobre 1994

There had been an interference because mere approval of land-use plan sufficient to limit applicant's exercise of his right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217532

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

This was so not because that was the date when they had inherited the property (as argued by the State) given that they also inherited their ancestor’s property rights, but rather because that was the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-345

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2011

18 octobre 2011

The storage of data concerning the applicant’s private life, including her profession, and the retention thereof, amounted to an interference within the meaning of Article   8, because it was personal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11597

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2017

25 juillet 2017

However, he was denied leave to appeal after the court of appeal noted that, because he had admitted the circumstances of the offence at his trial, he was precluded by Article   394 §   2 of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242114

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2025

30 janvier 2025

It also argued that it had been placed at a disadvantage vis-à-vis the Finnish company because the Finnish tax authorities did not keep record of tax debts below EUR 10,000, and because the managers of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230970

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2023

13 décembre 2023

information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)1383 );   Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228717

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2023

18 octobre 2023

information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)702 );   Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244744

Admin. suprême

8 août 2025

8 août 2025

She further complains under Article 8 of the Convention that following her dismissal her private life was adversely affected, and under Article 14 of the Convention that she was dismissed because of having

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230015

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2023

15 décembre 2023

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicant complains that the proceedings concerning the refusal to renew her security clearance were unfair because the SAC has not exercised sufficient judicial

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244918

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2025

3 septembre 2025

information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2025)638 );   Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in this case because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709DEC005305615

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2019

9 juillet 2019

It did not award any compensation for non-pecuniary damage because the applicant had failed to make such a claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249667

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2026

17 mars 2026

xa0; The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention that the searches of his car and of him personally were: (a)     not surrounded by sufficient safeguards against arbitrariness because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169412

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2016

10 novembre 2016

Relying on evidential material from the pre-investigation inquiry the court agreed that K.L. had committed suicide because of problems in his relationship with his girlfriend and not because of alleged

Source officielle
TA

JU Chambre Sociale

DTA_2408755_20250130

Administratif

30 janvier 2025

30 janvier 2025

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés le 3 septembre 2024, et le 22 octobre 2024, Mme B C épouse D, représentée par Me Tatiana Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'admettre

Source officielle
TA

1ère chambre

DTA_2410359_20250408

Administratif

8 avril 2025

8 avril 2025

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés le 15 octobre 2024 et le 18 octobre 2024, Mme C B épouse A, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124DEC001184121

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2023

24 janvier 2023

Government objected, firstly, that the applicant was no longer at risk of extradition and thus could not claim to be a victim of the alleged violation and, secondly, that the application was inadmissible because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110671

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2012

20 mars 2012

September 2007 the expert submitted, after examining the brother and the son – but not the applicant, who refused to co-operate –, that the applicant’s participation in the boy’s life was harmful, notably because

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-687174-694682

Admin. suprême

6 février 2003

6 février 2003

On 9 April 2002 Moscow City Court set aside their conviction and discharged them from serving their sentence because the time-limit for establishing their criminal liability had expired.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC004008398

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

COMPLAINTS The applicant complain that British social security legislation discriminates against her because she is the surviving spouse of a polygamous marriage.

Source officielle