FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE POITIERS ORDONNANCE DU PREMIER PRÉSIDENT RÉFÉRÉ Rendue par mise à disposition au greffe le vingt trois avril deux mille vingt six par Madame Estelle LAFOND

GILLE - Me NOTHUMB - Service Expertises - Régie Copies(s) exécutoires délivrées le à : JUGE DES RÉFÉRÉS : Pierre-Olivier DANINO, Président GREFFIER : Martine OLLIVIER, lors des débats Olivier LACOUA

Le 13 avril 2018, le juge des libertés et de la détention a ordonné la saisie de la propriété viticole dénommée "Château Labarde", acquise le 17 avril 2014 par la société Treasure Able Limited au prix

Il avait labouré cette parcelle à l'automne 2008 avec l'accord implicite de M. [U]. Toutefois M. [U] a donné cette parcelle en location à un autre agriculteur, M.

Labaune, conseiller référendaire, les observations de Me Haas, avocat de M.

Labaune, conseiller référendaire, les observations écrites de la SCP Piwnica et Molinié, avocat de M. [M] [L], de Mme [D], de MM.

Convention;   Whereas in her application, declared admissible by the Commission on 23   January 1996, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings before labour

admissible by the Commission on 18   October 1995, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings and the excessive length of certain civil proceedings before labour

Convention;   Whereas in her application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 5   March 1996, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings before labour

;   Whereas in its application, declared admissible by the Commission on 23   January 1996, the applicant guesthouse complained of the excessive length of certain civil proceedings before labour

application, declared admissible by the Commission on 22   October 1996, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning "civil rights and obligations" before the labour

application, as declared admissible by the Commission on 22   October 1996, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning "civil rights and obligations" before the labour

application, declared admissible by the Commission on 3   December 1996, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning "civil rights and obligations" before the labour

The applicant was an employee of a private company who initiated labour law proceedings against the employer after his dismissal.

She was subsequently fired, and labour court proceedings resulted in an agreement whereby her time-barred employment contract would not be renewed.

Bearing in mind that the rectification of a decision is not in principle available in labour disputes, was there any other mechanism to ensure consistency at the level of the Court of Cassation? 3.

application, declared admissible by the Commission on 3   December 1996, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning "civil rights and obligations" before the labour

application, declared admissible by the Commission on 16   September 1997, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the labour