CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC004725007
11 mai 2010
COMPLAINTS Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the length of the impugned proceedings, as well as the absence of an effective domestic remedy for procedural delay
Page 93 sur 868
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1201DEC000018611
1 décembre 2015
The applicant maintained his complaint concerning the delay in the enforcement of the judgment. 15.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223727
9 mars 2023
the applicants of their arbitrary and unfair convictions, in particular the prohibition on Mr Alexey Navalnyy to stand as a candidate during the 2017/2018 presidential election; Deeply
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3891
12 juin 2012
Armenia *, opposition to military service, where motivated by a serious and insurmountable conflict between the obligation to serve in the army and a person’s conscience or his deeply and genuinely held
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175891
6 juillet 2017
The applicant indicated that it could not comply with the time-limit for the second cassation appeal on account of the delay in receiving the decision of 6 May 2016.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7208
12 octobre 2000
The Government justified the delay by the enactment of several laws concerning the decrease of these pensions and the examination of the Yugoslav Military Pensions Act.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0531DEC007300617
31 mai 2022
the matter for several years, the applicants should have realised ineffectiveness of their complaints before the domestic authorities sooner and should have lodged their application without the undue delay
ECLI:CEDH:001-79846
28 février 2007
6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)17 [1] Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in 13 cases (see Appendix) concerning the administration’s delay
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC002414106
14 février 2012
Proceedings concerning a claim for non-pecuniary damage on account of the alleged delays in the above criminal proceedings On 21 September 2009 the respondent Government were given notice of the application
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1108DEC000736604
8 novembre 2007
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about a delay in enforcement of the judgment of 1 December 2003.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2831
15 février 2007
In view of the seriousness of the charges, the substantial delays involved had deprived the remedy of its effectiveness.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13961
17 janvier 2023
text-align:center } Legal summary January 2023 Machina v. the Republic of Moldova - 69086/14 Judgment 17.1.2023 [Section II] Article 3 Effective investigation Positive obligations Authorities’ unreasonable delay
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0119DEC003874121
19 janvier 2023
Another significant delay was also caused by the applicant’s and his representative’s failure to appear before the court and their requests for adjournment without reference to any valid reasons.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1828
6 novembre 2008
Law : The main issue in this case was the obligation to settle the matter of the child’s return to the United States without delay, so it was appropriate to examine it from the angle of the “positive”
5ème chambre 2ème section
67f56a51bbf04ef7857bb327
3 avril 2025
TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE [Localité 22] [1] [1] 7 Copies exécutoires - Me COULET - Me DELAY PEUCH - Me KNOUN - Me MALLET - Me TORDJMAN - Me FRERING - Me [Localité 20] délivrées le : + 1 Copie dossier
7ème chambre
DTA_2303180_20250327
27 mars 2025
Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 9 février et 23 octobre 2024, la société Orange, représentée par la Selarl ISEE (Me Delay), conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce que la somme de 1 400 euros
ECLI:CEDH:002-10411
22 février 1994
Responsibility of the public authorities engaged in relation to delay in regularising legal status of some of applicant's possessions.
3ème chambre
DTA_2209223_20250106
6 janvier 2025
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire en réplique enregistrés le 12 décembre 2022 et le 8 septembre 2023, Mme B Baron, représentée par le cabinet d'avocats ISEE (Me Delay), demande
ECLI:CEDH:001-205964
21 octobre 2020
hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”, Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of unjustified delays
2ème chambre
DTA_2008168_20221117
17 novembre 2022
Par des mémoires enregistrés les 12 mai et 9 juin 2022, la commune de Brignais, représentée par Me Delay, conclut aux mêmes fins que ses précédentes écritures mais ramène la somme demandée sur le fondement