AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225268
17 mai 2023
17 mai 2023
The applicant unsuccessfully argued, both before the CEC and subsequently before the administrative courts, that the omission in question had been of a purely technical nature and that he should have been
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206383
4 novembre 2020
4 novembre 2020
They shared several telephone numbers, both landline and mobile, all of which were registered as belonging to the second applicant.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2406005_20250416
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
BOHN
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2406006_20250416
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
BOHN
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2406007_20250416
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
BOHN
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2406008_20250416
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
BOHN
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2406009_20250416
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
BOHN
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Strasbourg
ORTA_2406010_20250416
16 avril 2025
16 avril 2025
BOHN
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2445
13 novembre 2007
13 novembre 2007
This practice was incompatible with the principle of “subjective impartiality”, since no one could act as both plaintiff and judge.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205DEC007216401
5 décembre 2006
5 décembre 2006
She sued both her former employer (the ambulance station) and the company responsible for the accident. She sought a pension, damages and just satisfaction.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3514
12 janvier 2006
12 janvier 2006
the right to live in and use their native settlement in Uummannaq/Dundas in the Thule District and that they had the right to move, stay and hunt in the entire Thule District; and seeking compensation both
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0603DEC005455900
3 juin 2003
3 juin 2003
Thirdly, this surcharge is imposed under a general rule, whose purpose is both deterrent and punitive.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-777928-794126
19 juin 2003
19 juin 2003
Both the journalists and the prosecution appealed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0219DEC006533401
19 février 2002
19 février 2002
The applicant and his wife were married in 1992 and had two children, both born in 1995. The applicant’s wife died on 9 July 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7082
15 juin 2000
15 juin 2000
The Court observed that in the case before it the author of the article at issue had sought to provide an explanation for developments in south-east Turkey and had expressed his point of view on both the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC003747597
30 mars 1999
30 mars 1999
Both applicants are represented before the Court by Mr Gilbert Blades, a lawyer practising in Lincoln. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. A.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624JUD000690102
24 juin 2003
24 juin 2003
Subsequently, the General Prosecutor filed an extraordinary appeal against the judgments of both courts. 12.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2970394-3271183
22 décembre 2009
22 décembre 2009
Both applicants relied on Article 6 § 1 (right of access to a court).
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3022254-3334865
11 février 2010
11 février 2010
xa0; Unanimously: Violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights Principal facts The applicant in both
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145293
3 juin 2014
3 juin 2014
He asked the court to declare that both parties were at fault for the breakdown of marriage. On 16 February 2011 the Łódź Regional Court refused to grant the applicant a divorce.
Source officiellePage 93 sur 1534