A further hearing was held on 18 March 1977.   The rogatory proceedings were terminated in 1978, the hearing was closed on 10 February 1978.

He complains that he was held in a small and poorly aired room waiting for the hearings and in a metal cage during the hearings themselves.

At the hearing, the first applicant denied the accusations and the second applicant exercised her right to remain silent.

The applicant represented himself at this hearing.

Otherwise, he did not regard an oral hearing necessary. The insurance company did not request an oral hearing at this stage.

For his private use, the applicant intended to make an audio recording of the hearing.

        The date of a hearing was fixed for 30 December 1992.   The applicant requested that this hearing be adjourned.

The hearings before the City Court took place on several dates. 12 .

Therefore, when a question is purely legal there is no real need for an oral hearing. The hearing can equally well be in writing.

Furthermore she did not request a hearing. 8 .

The applicant’s lawyer was present at the hearing.

Given that the Supreme Administrative Court does not, as a rule, hold oral hearings in matters of the present kind, the applicant could have been expected to request such a hearing in express terms, if

Turkey 15/04/2019 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 24 22103/19 Çetin v.

before the hearing.

Nor was her evidence discredited by her failure to recognise the applicant at the court hearing, as at court hearings witnesses were in a particularly stressful situation.

Turkey 17/08/2019 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 42 51075/19 Açar v.

  Lack of oral hearing 1.

The case concerns the conditions of the applicant’s detention, his health conditions and medical care provided to him in the SIZO and the conditions of his detention during the court hearings.

    Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of her civil rights, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Austria - 16717/90 Judgment 28.5.1997 Article 6 Constitutional proceedings Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Public hearing Lack of a public hearing in the Constitutional Court in proceedings concerning