CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 269 résultats pour « Forgeron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000531211

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

The indictment against N.I. contained several charges, ranging from forgery (Article 479 of the Criminal Code) for having, inter alia , failed to disclose his professional relationship with one of the

Page 92 sur 114

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0711JUD002897505

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2013

11 juillet 2013

    On 18 July 2005 the Moscow Tushinskiy district prosecutor initiated criminal proceedings against the applicant on suspicion of forgery of documents submitted by the latter to the District

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC007552201

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

On 19 January 2000 the investigator appointed to deal with his case formally charged the applicant with aggravated embezzlement of public funds and forgery and interrogated him in the presence of his lawyer

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0415JUD002219818

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2025

15 avril 2025

the High Court”) in a final judgment of 2   June 2016, the Constanţa Court of Appeal sentenced the third applicant to seven years’ imprisonment for accepting a bribe, influence-peddling, fraud, forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0125DEC002726295

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2001

25 janvier 2001

sentence in Finland inter alia on one count of robbery (committed in April 1991), two counts of theft (committed in November 1993), one count of fraud, two counts of attempted fraud and two counts of forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0325JUD004577918

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2025

25 mars 2025

    On 24 May 2016 the Mardin Assize Court convicted the applicant and Ş.A. of membership of an armed terrorist organisation and of forgery of an official document, on the basis of, inter alia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD000882409

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2015

9 juillet 2015

Moreover, two additional arrest warrants were pending against him in Germany, one relating to a further offence of drug trafficking and the other, dated 1 July 2004, concerning forgery of identification

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1029REP003397796

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 1998

29 octobre 1998

  On 4 October 1993 the applicant was arrested on charges of forgery of documents and fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD002861703

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2008

4 décembre 2008

    On 29 October 1998 the applicant was additionally charged with organising a criminal undertaking, abuse of position, unlawful possession of weapons, abetting forgery of documents and actions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD004639809

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2014

24 avril 2014

In respect of the first applicant, the investigation also concerned charges of abuse of position, fraud and forgery and as regards the third applicant, charges of fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405DEC001699902

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2007

5 avril 2007

On 25 March 2004 prosecutor Z. decided to charge the applicant with fraudulent acquisition of property, relating to 18 incidents, and forgery of documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD003189011

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2013

3 octobre 2013

of Tajikistan (“the Agency”) opened criminal proceedings against the applicant and eight other individuals on charges of misappropriation and embezzlement of property, money laundering, tax evasion, forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0220JUD001679405

Admin. suprême

20 février 2014

20 février 2014

On the same day the investigator in charge of the case informed the applicant that he was charged under Articles 178 (fraud), 179 (embezzlement) and 313 (forgery by an official) of the Criminal Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD007552201

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2008

6 novembre 2008

    On 19 January 2000 the investigator appointed to deal with his case formally charged the applicant with aggravated embezzlement of public funds and forgery. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD006363814

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2017

19 janvier 2017

    The investigation of suspected forgery of identity documents 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD004657914

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2024

6 juin 2024

  Forgery by an official “Forgery by an official, that is, the entry by an official of information which is known to be false into official documents or information resources, or the making of changes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD004213908

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

office of the Special Investigation Service that, as a person of equivalent status to a civil servant, she was under investigation on suspicion of fraudulent management of accounts, abuse of office and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003916306

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2009

13 janvier 2009

The applicant was charged with fraud and forgery of documents, committed in an organised criminal group.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0831DEC002007592

Admin. suprême

31 août 1994

31 août 1994

, Scotland and on 25 November 1988 at Reading Crown Court, England respectively the applicant was convicted of a series of offenses of theft, fraud, housebreaking, criminal damage, public mischief, forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1109DEC001316287

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1987

9 novembre 1987

  He did not know it was a forgery until he was so informed by the Immigration authorities at Heathrow airport.

Source officielle