The filing of a complaint about delays shall not be limited in time. 3.

In any event, the delays caused by such actions on the part of the applicant appear to be insignificant. 41.

    Applying the criteria, the Court observes that the proceedings do not appear to be complex and no significant delays in the proceedings can be attributed to the applicants.

  The applicants' delays in instructing a solicitor (19 July 1982 to 16 July 1983) and the further delay of seven months from the date when the solicitor had been instructed until the notice of appeal

There had been no two and a half year delay, as alleged by the applicant.

The Court therefore admits that this might have caused some delays in the proceedings.

Considerable delays in the proceedings were caused by the courts’ inactivity in 1995-1999 and then by their failure to duly serve copies of the judgments on her.

  This delay was caused exclusively by the fact that the Cracow University was slow in the preparation of its opinion, explaining the delay by its workload.     43.

No substantial delays were imputable to the applicants and what was at stake for them called for special diligence.

This delay appears attributable to the domestic courts and cannot be justified (see and compare with Rudysh v. Ukraine , no.   18957/03, § 21, 15 November 2007). 46.

It also transmitted the case to the Warsaw Court of Appeal with a view to examining the alleged delays in the proceedings before the Regional Court.

.-19100 BRIVE représenté par Me Christian DELPY, avocat au barreau de CORREZE Madame Nicole Y... épouse X...

BRIVE, Me Nathalie KORCHIA, avocat plaidant inscrit au barreau de PARIS MAIF, prise en la personne de son représentant légal, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 7] Représentée par Me Christian DELPY

La présidente du tribunal a désigné, en application de l'article L. 511-2 du code de justice administrative, Mme Isabelle Dely, première vice-présidente, comme juge des référés.

It ordered the mayor, in his capacity as chairman of the local commission, to pay the applicants a pecuniary penalty of 3,000 Romanian lei (ROL) for each day’s delay in enforcement. 12.

She also complained under Article 13 of the Convention, about a lack of effective remedies for such delays. Her case is presently pending at second instance.

Resolution ResDH(2002)40 concerning the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 April 2001 (final on 10 July 2001) in 22 cases against Turkey (see Appendix) relating to the administration’s delay

The High Court decided not to order the judge to stand down and considered that the applicant was in fact seeking to delay the proceedings.

It observed that, considering the delay of sixteen months, these proceedings suffered from a procedural defect.