CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD002417814
10 février 2022
In such cases, the Court must establish whether the other grounds given by the judicial authorities continued to justify the deprivation of liberty.
Page 91 sur 763
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD005529907
19 décembre 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327JUD001156402
27 mars 2008
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD003047218
7 juillet 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD003018517
14 octobre 2025
Turkey , no. 28749/18, §§ 71-72, 10 December 2019), the competent judicial authorities justified their decisions to deprive the applicants of their liberty not only on the basis of the existence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD001392117
18 janvier 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD000196207
12 décembre 2017
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312JUD003520423
12 mars 2026
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD002998505
19 juin 2012
They thus failed to justify the applicant’s continued deprivation of liberty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD002976909
6 juin 2017
The Court reiterates that, in circumstances where applicants have continued to be deprived of their liberty while the criminal proceedings were pending at the appeal stage, it has always
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD002418508
4 mai 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1015JUD002792910
15 octobre 2019
On 22 December 2009 the Constitutional Court found no violation of the applicant’s right to liberty and security. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD003169110
15 octobre 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD004005220
22 juillet 2021
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13127
9 février 2021
More generally, the need to continue the deprivation of liberty could not be assessed from a purely abstract point of view, taking into consideration only the seriousness of the offence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0606JUD005246221
6 juin 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0902JUD001710119
2 septembre 2021
The applicant first pointed out that he had been detained since 4 January 2012 and that such a lengthy deprivation of liberty eliminated any risk that he would pursue his criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD003368205
11 février 2014
or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of the presumption of innocence, a departure from the rule of respect for individual liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD003665320
10 juin 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0226JUD003571022
26 février 2026