On 7   November 1995 another hearing took place and was then adjourned until 5   December 1995. The applicant apologised for his absence at the latter hearing.

    On 19 January 2001 the hearing was adjourned until 22 March 2001 on account of the applicant's failure to appear. The applicant's counsel attended the hearing. 11.

As that information did not reach the court in time, it adjourned a hearing fixed for 8 November 2001. The court decided to summon the first applicant's receiver for the next hearing. 36.

The hearing fixed for 18 June 1997 was adjourned due to the strike of the court's administrative staff. The hearing of 8 October was also adjourned. 21.

her lawyer had withdrawn from the case without notifying her about the hearing).

The Federal Administrative Court dismissed their request, stating that an oral hearing would clearly not have led to a further clarification of the relevant facts.

On 30 April 1993 the court held a hearing. At the hearing of 2 February 1994 the plaintiff informed the court that proceedings had been instituted against him by the applicant.

A further hearing appears to have been held on 5   December 1996.

While in the ordinary course of events according to the Government, the hearing on the merits would have been listed for hearing in the first half of 1993, the Council applied to the Employment Tribunal

The applicant was given floor at the end of the hearing to submit any additional arguments.

  He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Nedzela v.

As to the eight administrative courts, appellants requested an oral hearing in a total of 603   cases. The courts held an oral hearing in 129 cases.

hearings.

    On 18   July   1997 the court held a hearing and heard evidence from the parties. A hearing listed for 1   August   1997 was cancelled. 10.

  The applicant, who was in custody, was informed about the date of the hearing and told that he could only be represented by defence counsel at the hearing.

The court adjourned the hearing until 20 July 2010. 9.

The Town Court held several hearings during which the applicant put questions to a number of witnesses.

The first hearing took place on 18 December 1992.

    First, on 15 January 2020, having taken and examined all the evidence at a hearing, the Court of Appeal adopted a judgment in which the applicant was found guilty as charged.