CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 269 résultats pour « Forgeron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC004188605

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

  56094/09 05/10/2009 Gökhan SANCI 28/06/1974 Amasya   Cavit ÇALIŞ On 19 September 2007 criminal proceedings for forgery were initiated against the applicant, an officer in the Army.

Page 91 sur 114

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC490 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

LES FORGERONS

SIREN 989831052Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de manosque

14/07/2026

Voir →

Créations

SCI LES VILLAS DES FORGERONS

SIREN 106579048Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Strasbourg

10/07/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

L UNION DES FORGERONS

SIREN 572165199Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'evry

23/06/2026

Voir →

Créations

SCI DU FORGERON

SIREN 103987244Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Aurillac

28/04/2026

Voir →

Ventes et cessions

LES FORGERONS, ULTRE, Bernadette Christiane Madeleine

SIREN 999568256Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce d'Alençon

mise en activité de la société sur achat ou apport. Cession sous acte authentique en date du 08/04/2026 Adresse de l'ancien propriétaire: 4 Bis Rue de Céaucé Sept Forges 61330 Juvigny Val d'Andaine

19/04/2026

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC004697007

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2016

14 juin 2016

The findings of the CDDH do not alter the conclusion that the ‘ attestation de perte des pièces d’identité ’ is a forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203JUD002276512

Admin. suprême

3 février 2015

3 février 2015

applicant was extended in connection with other offences allegedly committed by him, namely trading in influence, complicity in and incitement to money laundering, and complicity in and incitement to forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327DEC007399001

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

Proceedings are still pending. c) Forgery and related proceedings On 24 February 2000 the traffic police stopped one of the petrol tank trucks which belonged to the first applicant and allegedly seized

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1020DEC003397796

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1997

20 octobre 1997

The criminal proceedings        On 4 October 1993 the applicant was arrested on charges under Section 212 paras. 1,2 and 4 of the Penal Code (Nakazatelen kodeks) concerning forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1219JUD003548997

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2002

19 décembre 2002

19 December 1996 the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's detention until 24 February 1997, having regard to newly discovered circumstances of the case which would justify bringing charges of forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0126JUD001437988

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 1993

26 janvier 1993

paragraph 13 above), pre-trial detention on the ground of a risk of collusion could only be justified by specific evidence, such as in this case the applicant’s personality and the numerous examples of forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105JUD000333012

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2013

5 novembre 2013

    On 16 November 1996 a pre-trial investigation against M.N. was opened: he was accused of forgery of documents and misappropriation of property. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD006741301

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

    On 2 June 2000 the applicant was charged with a number of additional counts relating to embezzlement, abuse of power and forgery. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1004JUD002750495

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2001

4 octobre 2001

    A day later, on 6 November 1993, the Poznań-Nowe Miasto District Prosecutor charged the applicant with forgery and attempting to obtain a loan of USD 25,000,000 by false pretences, committed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0517JUD003973112

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2018

17 mai 2018

Environmental Crime) issued charges (siktelse ) against the applicant for aiding and abetting fraud in connection with art sales ( kunstbedrageri ), an application for a bank loan ( lånebedrageri ), and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD004104011

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

    By a final judgment of 12 June 2012 the Court of Cassation dismissed the criminal proceedings with no civil claims that had been brought by the applicant against prosecutor G.B. for forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD000064908

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

2004, as a leader, in the activity of a terrorist group (the Moroccan Islamic Fighting Group, referred to hereinafter as “GICM” after its French name Groupe Islamique Combattant Marocain ), and with forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0508DEC001189485

Admin. suprême

8 mai 1989

8 mai 1989

  The Chamber found that according to the results obtained so far in the investigations the applicant was suspected of forgery as well as of having caused damages of up to 2 million AS to various

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0304JUD007183501

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2010

4 mars 2010

It noted that only a sample of the merchandise had been analysed for counterfeit labels and that, therefore, all bottles had to be attached in relation to the pending criminal proceedings for forgery by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2002

29 janvier 2002

applicant was arrested in New York (USA) and placed in detention on the basis of a extradition request from the authorities of the Netherlands Antilles where he had been charged with embezzlement and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC003038196

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1997

23 octobre 1997

On 4 January 1988 he was convicted by the Kardjali Regional Court for forgery and fraud and was sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD000835117

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2019

9 juillet 2019

offence under Articles 497 and 497 bis , if the offence in question concerns either the euro or other currencies which are legal tender in Belgium or objects intended for use in their manufacture, forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD005070511

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2021

13 juillet 2021

    By a judgment of the Plovdiv Regional Court of 24 July 2008 the first and second applicants were convicted of aggravated document forgery, preparation to commit forgery and possession of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122JUD003196308

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

Courts had previously issued several arrest warrants for JM in connection with prison sentences imposed on him earlier by three final judgments (six months ordered on 19 November 2003 for larceny and forgery

Source officielle