As to the justification for that interference, pursuant to Article   234 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant could have challenged the investigator’s decisions before the prosecutor or

Nevertheless, the applicant challenged that finding citing the police criminal laboratory’s expert report dated 31 March 2006 in which it was concluded that there had only been one fingerprint on the duct

The decision was not challenged and became binding a month after.

The courts added that the lawyer of the applicant’s mother could have also challenged the registration of any illegitimate owner, which he had failed to do.

He challenged the ceiling applied by A.G.S. to the sum owed to him, first before the industrial tribunal, then before the Court of Appeal, which, relying on the Court of Cassation’s judgment of December

The European Court found that the applicant had been unable to challenge the truth of these accusations, which were the origin of his dismissal, before a tribunal (violation of Article 6§1).

The applicant did not challenge that decision.

They further maintained that the applicant had not challenged the alleged inactivity of the Bailiffs’ Service and had not claimed relevant compensation before the domestic courts.

Elle n'apporte aux débats que des exemples de tels challenges développés par des sociétés avec lesquelles elle ne justifie pas se trouver en lien juridique.

It relied, inter alia , on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and challenged the Supreme Court’s decision.

André XE..., demeurant ... à Saint-Chamond (Loire), 33°) M. Omar YY..., demeurant ... à Saint-Chamond (Loire), 34°) M.

de Saint-Chamond à M.

The applicant’s challenge for bias lodged before the court of appeal was rejected with the sole reasoning that no reason for bias could be found.

In 2016, the Constitutional Court found that the legal framework did not provide for effective proceedings in which the holders of the cancelled shares could challenge the Bank of Slovenia’s measures and

In particular, was there any possibility that the applicant company could effectively challenge the forfeiture (see Ünsped Paket Servisi SaN. Ve TiC. A.Ş. v. Bulgaria , no.

The adjournment of 8 May 1996 was justified by the fact that the applicants had challenged some further acts and submitted new evidence.

Le 3 avril 2025, le Tribunal de Commerce de Châlons-en-Champagne a prononcé la liquidation judiciaire de la SAS LE FLUVIO.

OCTOBRE 2025 N° RG 25/00184 - N° Portalis DBVF-V-B7J-GTPT MINUTE N° Décision déférée à la Cour : Ordonnance du 13 janvier 2025, rendue par le Juge de la mise en état du tribunal judiciaire de Chalon