CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0413JUD002452019
13 avril 2023
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)
Page 90 sur 763
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1115JUD003540207
15 novembre 2018
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003077706
12 avril 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006354213
25 juin 2020
It appears that the domestic courts did not attempt to demonstrate the existence of specific facts proving that the declared risks outweighing the rule of respect for individual liberty existed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD004292110
1 octobre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD002155219
10 décembre 2020
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221JUD003991206
21 février 2012
In so far as the applicant complains about refusal of J.Ch’s visit, the Court reiterates that detention, like any other measure depriving a person of his liberty, entails inherent limitations
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0126JUD002911909
26 janvier 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD001953614
12 juillet 2016
No one may be deprived of his liberty otherwise than on the grounds and according to the procedures established by law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD002238604
25 mars 2014
or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of the presumption of innocence, a departure from the rule of respect for individual liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0226JUD000620007
26 février 2013
that where the law provides for a presumption in respect of factors relevant to the grounds for continued detention, the existence of the concrete facts outweighing the rule of respect for individual liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD006734110
25 septembre 2012
which in cases with an international element, such as this one, can vary significantly), the [applicant’s] personal circumstances and his personality, his behaviour before and after the deprivation of liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD002878511
9 janvier 2014
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-e - Persons of unsound mind)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0922JUD000275007
22 septembre 2016
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD003530208
21 juin 2016
arrested or detained are entitled to a review bearing upon the procedural and substantive conditions which are essential for the “lawfulness”, in the sense of the Convention, of their deprivation of liberty
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0504JUD000966810
4 mai 2017
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0505JUD001773008
5 mai 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD004923212
19 juin 2018
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD003380304
23 avril 2015
The decision stated that the applicant had a permanent address and was not trying to abscond and that there was therefore no need to deprive him of his liberty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0702JUD005218017
2 juillet 2020