the child she had cared for had been given disability status.

In the present case, the High Court had proceeded on the assumption that the applicant’s complaint had been within the scope of Article   8 and that his conviction and sentence had amounted to an

against which he had appealed.

had become time-barred.

He also had relations in foreign countries and had been convicted before.

had been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention in that the Turkish authorities had not carried out an effective investigation; that there had been a violation of Article 13 (right to an effective

Furthermore, there was no indication that prison staff had had a standardised policy of punishments for inmates who had perpetrated violence seeking to enforce the informal code of conduct on others.

had disposed of less than 3 sq. m² of personal space.

’s body, and that they had not explored the possibility that his son had been killed in a different location and that his body had been moved afterwards to the location where it had been found. 15.

After they had walked in the direction of their homes for a while, Ferhat had fallen to the ground. As they had tried to lift him up they had noticed that he had been injured above his right eyebrow.

had been alive, and that it was not true that at that time it had been impossible to get in touch with him; iii) this failure had a direct incidence on the finding that the State Treasury had been in

part in the original proceedings and at the time had not been provided with copies of the contested judgments, the prosecutor had had “justifiable reasons” for missing the time-limit.

They had never had any reason to doubt the lawfulness of the transaction and had been owners in good faith.

No soap, towel, toothbrush or toothpaste had been provided and she had regularly had to ask the staff for toilet paper.

The applicant, who had been held in detention pending his trial, complained that he had thus been removed from the political scene.

The Chamber had concluded that the applicant association had belonged to the first group, in that it had been obliged to refrain from organising public meetings to avoid the criminal penalties provided

The applicant had no education or work and a limited support network. She had had considerable problems relating to appointments and had appeared rigid and immature to the Board.

had not been excessive.

two years earlier and Mr Z had declared that he had no longer any proof to submit.