Following a dispute with another person about the wording of a cheque, the applicants were prosecuted for forgery, use of forged documents and fraud in 1991.

    On 9 December 2000 the applicant was additionally charged with offences under Articles 188 § 3 (smuggling), 191 § 2 (unlawful trade in precious stones), and 327 (forgery of official documents

was based on a search warrant issued by the District Court of Frankfurt on 12 September 1983 against the previous owner of the house in connection with criminal proceedings based on a suspicion of forgery

also a risk of repetition of the offences as the applicant had five previous convictions, including a sentence to twenty months’ imprisonment, imposed by the Stuttgart Regional Court, for fraud and forgery

Moreover, the wording of the letter of 23 April 1993 from the Zairese embassy in Paris indicated that it was not an official document but a forgery.

  The Chamber found that according to the results obtained so far in the investigations the applicant was suspected of forgery as well as of having caused damages of up to 2 million AS to various

    On 19   March 2003 the applicant was again charged with large-scale swindling committed by a group of persons and with forgery of official documents. 47.

On 19 August 2000 the GPS instituted a criminal investigation into the offences envisaged by Articles 70 (smuggling) and 172-1 (forgery) of the CC.

On 19   March 2003 the applicant was again charged with large-scale swindling committed by a group of persons and with forgery of official documents.

    On 20 June 1983 Chantiers Beneteau lodged a complaint with the senior Toulon investigating judge against a person or persons unknown for forgery of commercial documents and fraud by the falsification

Proceedings were brought against them and eleven other individuals for offences related to the management of the laboratory, including forgery and failure to comply with Article 3 of Royal Decree no. 143

including exposing a   patient to a direct danger to his life or health (Article 160 § 1 of the Criminal Code (“CC”)), homicide of a patient (Article 148 § 1 of the CC), harassing a member of staff, forgery

Consequently, the substantive application did not proceed and thus no factual findings were made as regards the Minister’s allegations of forgery. 5.

heard a substantial number of witnesses, the Sverdlovsk Regional Court found the applicant, who was represented by counsel throughout the proceedings, guilty of unlawful possession of a weapon and forgery

    In June 2005 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant on suspicion of forgery of the administrative-offence record (“the   offence record”) in the above case.

incumbent mayor: “... as transpires from a complaint by residents to the Shchelkovo town prosecutor’s office, U.’s wife, a certain L.K., in abuse of her position as head of the Fryazino BTI ..., committed forgery

illegal acquisition, transfer, sale, storage, transportation, or bearing of firearms, ammunition or explosives, with aggravating circumstances), Article 279 (armed mutiny) and part 1 of Article 327 (forgery

The District Court noted that it was necessary to investigate allegations of forgery in respect of the medical file and, in particular, in relation to the signature of the applicant’s wife indicating her

    The first applicant was found guilty of all charges related to money laundering, business fraud, embezzlement, forgery of various financial documents and abuse of power.