CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

59 099 résultats pour « Febbraro »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC001083313

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2015

20 octobre 2015

As regards the judgements of 23 June 2003 and 19   February 2004, the Government refused to settle the case and provided written observations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215DEC003854516

Admin. suprême

15 février 2024

15 février 2024

width:138.09pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 38545/16 Constantin MINESCU against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 15   February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC002845805

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

On 24 February 2005 the Supreme Court of Ukraine re-considered the above cassation appeals and quashed decisions of 2 April and 24 June 2003.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115065

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2012

6 novembre 2012

    The applicant’s detention on remand in SIZO-4 in Menzelinsk Between 4 April 2008 and 16 February 2009 the applicant was detained in SIZO-4 in Menzelinsk.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC006684810

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2017

2 mai 2017

permit, valid from 7   February 2017 until 7 February 2022 (see Annexe).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0208DEC002289505

Admin. suprême

8 février 2007

8 février 2007

On 26 February 2004 the Supreme Court of the Kalmykiya Republic upheld the judgment on appeal. On 3 May 2005 the amount due was credited to the applicant’s account.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250153

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2026

16 avril 2026

  5766/17, §§ 90-92, 106-09, 8   February 2022)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112379

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2012

4 juillet 2012

In February 2005 it dismissed the applicant’s request to return the passport to him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231324

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2024

30 janvier 2024

On 18 February 2015 P.S. had a brief home leave. He told his family that he would finish his service in about two weeks and would return home.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516DEC002803223

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

In particular, the Court notes, and it is not disputed by the parties, that on 9 February 2021 the conditions of the applicant’s detention had significantly improved.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68980

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2005

25 avril 2005

s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)25 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 1 February

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144701

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2014

13 mai 2014

On 15 February 2006 Mr B.’s widow, Ms B., was questioned and submitted the following.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519JUD001729510

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2015

19 mai 2015

    The Government requested revision of the judgment of 11 February 2014, which they had been unable to execute because the applicant had died before the judgment had been adopted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003264896

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2001

22 mars 2001

February 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1207DEC004373098

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2000

7 décembre 2000

On 5 February 1997 the National Council adopted resolution No. 530 in which it noted that the Slovak National Party filled the vacant office by another person.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0527JUD005482200

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2003

27 mai 2003

    On 22 February 1989 the applicant filed a claim for damages with the Košice 1 District Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1119DEC007783101

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2002

19 novembre 2002

It appears that on 15 February 1996 the proceedings were finally discontinued.

Source officielle
CC

civ3

613721cfcd580146773f7956

Cassation

31 mars 1993

31 mars 1993

(Haut-Rhin), 28) de la société anonyme Etablissements Ferrari frères, dont le siège est ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC006382100

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2002

12 décembre 2002

They specified that they would not carry out their duties between 1 and 5   February 1993.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0403DEC006775401

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2003

3 avril 2003

They specified that they would not carry out their duties between 1 and 5   February 1993.

Source officielle

Page 90 sur 2955

← PrécédentSuivant →