CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604DEC004568999

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2002

4 juin 2002

There is a right of appeal against both conviction and sentence of all courts martial to the Courts-Martial Appeal Court (a civilian court of appeal) (section 8 of the Courts-Martial (Appeals) Act 1968

Page 90 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147732

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2014

7 octobre 2014

On 10 April 2012 the Kirov regional department of the Investigative Committee closed the criminal investigation against both applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD002073905

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2010

27 juillet 2010

The court noted that both parents were well educated and had sufficient salaries to provide for their daughters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD002220010

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2017

30 mai 2017

Both applicants also complained about the search of their home. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913JUD003653602

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2005

13 septembre 2005

In a letter dated 13 June 2002, the Superintendent Registrar stated that under the relevant domestic legislation, it would be impossible for the applicants to marry unless A and C were both dead: “...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC005127799

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2004

14 septembre 2004

They further observe that the applicant’s lawyer was present when the police investigator examined both witnesses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127DEC005444500

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2004

27 janvier 2004

Both K. and A. claimed the right to remain silent in respect of certain questions put by the defence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329JUD006111212

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2016

29 mars 2016

    Both the prosecution and defence appealed against the judgment before the Cáceres Audiencia Provincial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD003537515

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2020

10 décembre 2020

    On 25 February 2011 Officer Z.M. appeared at the trial court and was questioned outside the main hearing in the absence of both the defence and the prosecution.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC004357798

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

Both live in Dobrolevo (Bulgaria).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0701JUD005767818

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2021

1 juillet 2021

The second applicant also has two other children from an earlier relationship; they were born in 2006 and 2007 and were both taken into public care in 2007. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1029JUD001263187

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 1991

29 octobre 1991

The Court of Appeal called upon to examine Mr Fejde’s appeal also exercised jurisdiction as to both facts and law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202DEC000539803

Admin. suprême

2 février 2006

2 février 2006

Even where the court of appeal has jurisdiction both over the facts and in law, Article 6 does not always require a right to a public hearing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112384

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

Both decisions of the Graz Regional Court for Civil Matters appear to be translated to Slovenian and the translations served on the applicant. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223JUD004595208

Admin. suprême

23 février 2010

23 février 2010

    The Court notes that the proceedings ended, in respect of both applicants, on 11   April   2008, when the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181915

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2018

9 mars 2018

Both children were born in Poland. They have a registered residence in Poland, Hungary and in the United Kingdom.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0420DEC003955298

Admin. suprême

20 avril 1999

20 avril 1999

The applicant contends that both Lord Justices of Appeal rejected the defendant’s argument that the libel action should be struck out on the ground of abuse of process by motive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1211DEC003948503

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2006

11 décembre 2006

Both children had declared that they did not want to have any contact with their father and opposed that he would obtain the right of custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003457504

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

Both men were found shot dead on the Cortamlet Road, Altnamachin, in South Armagh. Colm McCartney had been shot four times, Sean Farmer six times.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0428DEC002043611

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2020

28 avril 2020

In both applications, the investigations were still formally pending at the time when the proceedings before the Court were initiated (compare Utsmiyeva and Others v. Russia (dec.), no.

Source officielle