Investigation into the applicants’ alleged ill-treatment 18 .

The application also concerns the use of the evidence obtained from the applicant and the co-defendants under alleged duress during the preliminary investigation stage (see, Hakan Duman v.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, concerning an alleged breach of their right to access to court, as well as their complaints under Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to

She lodged the complaint against her ex-husband and certain members of his family who, she alleged, had aided and abetted the abduction.

The applicant also alleged that the daily walk is done in an overcrowded yard where there is not enough space for walking. In 2013 the applicant was diagnosed with hepatitis C.

.) - 40451/98 Decision 7.12.1999 [Section III] Article 5 Article 5-2 Information on reasons for arrest Alleged lack of information on reasons for arrest: inadmissible Information on charge Alleged lack

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3, 6 and 10 of the Convention concerning the alleged ill-treatment in police custody and the alleged unfairness of the criminal defamation proceedings against

It sued the Municipality of Győr for the alleged segregation of Romani children in a local primary school.

Official inquiry into the alleged ill-treatment 10.

The application concerns the alleged failure of the national authorities to discharge their obligations to protect the applicants’ right to respect for private and family life and to comply with domestic

    On 4 May 2013 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning his alleged ill-treatment by prison officers, the

The applications concern the alleged push ‑ backs of the applicants from Greece back to Turkey after they crossed the borders in Evros-Edirne area in February 2020. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

.) - 52902/15 Decision 7.6.2016 [Section II] Article 13 Effective remedy Alleged inability to challenge applicants’ deportation orders: inadmissible Facts – In September 2015 the applicants – a Syrian

October 2020 Published on 2 November 2020   SECOND SECTION Application no. 18815/18 Abdullah SAÇAK against Turkey lodged on 11 April 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

On the same date the applicant’s alleged heirs, represented by Ms   M.A.   Palmieri and Ms E.D.

On 28 September 2016 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv ordered the investigating authority dealing with the criminal case against the applicant to conduct an inquiry into his alleged ill-treatment

February 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 25827/23 Metin ÜNAL against Türkiye lodged on 14 June 2023 communicated on 7 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged

CASE The application concerns the disbarment of the applicant, who was a lawyer specialised in the field of protection of human rights, on account of the statements that he made to the press on the alleged

Moreover, the domestic courts did not make any comment in respect of the applicant’s argument concerning the alleged discriminatory treatment.