CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1124JUD003649317

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2020

24 novembre 2020

referring to the State agents as “murderers, mafiosi, violent [individuals]” while terrorist activities were continuing in south-east Turkey, with armed attacks being carried out targeting State officials

Page 9 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0829JUD005946421

Admin. suprême

29 août 2024

29 août 2024

The statements were summarised in the judgment as follows: “It has been established from the pre-trial statement given ... by A.G. on 26   August 2016 [read out] during the trial that ... while swimming

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228921

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

Ukraine [Committee], no. 34199/09, the Court found, inter alia , a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of torture the applicant was subjected to while in police custody in 2008 and lack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233376

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

    At what time did the applicant’s detention start on 25 March 2022?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222863

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2023

6 janvier 2023

(c)     When did the police start collaborating with Mr P. in the present case?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-736

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

Law – Article 8 in conjunction with Article   14: The applicant’s transsexualism was what had prompted the former wife to bring proceedings to amend the arrangements made at the time of their separation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD002654008

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

What happened early in the morning of 15 December 2005 in the residence of the accused has been established by the statements of the victim [V.].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002JUD004234104

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2007

2 octobre 2007

    The Court recognises that while what was at stake for the applicant had some financial importance, its significance cannot be said to have been exceptional.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111DEC005682515

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

The State, represented by the Legal Register Centre, is the respondent in such a case.” COMPLAINT 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0428JUD004872122

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2026

28 avril 2026

This is because States have a duty under the Convention to take measures for the protection of the public from violent crime, and the Convention does not prohibit States from subjecting a person convicted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0302REP001760291

Admin. suprême

2 mars 1995

2 mars 1995

  Subsequently, the accused has the opportunity to make a brief statement on the indictment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184675

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2018

22 juin 2018

T.D. was questioned again on 18 January, 19 January and 12 July 2007 and on each occasion he stood by his previous statements.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0703DEC004419098

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2001

3 juillet 2001

The best guarantee would be one from the State Governor or the President of the United States.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC004430113

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

    Lord Justice Stuart-Smith Inquiry 26.     In June 1997, the Secretary of State for the Home Department ordered a “scrutiny” of new evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC003732613

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2016

29 mars 2016

Eventually Abby is tipped into clinical mental illness and performs an act of self-mutilation which she believes will restore her to a virginal state, and that is what finally blows apart their relationship

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD001643210

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2020

10 décembre 2020

    In its decision, the Zarichnyy District Court of Sumy stated that the victims’ statements should be accepted as the basis for a conviction, as the statements were logical, consistent and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD003732613

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2018

15 mai 2018

Eventually Abby is tipped into clinical mental illness and performs an act of self-mutilation which she believes will restore her to a virginal state, and that is what finally blows apart their relationship

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

What are pregnant women to do? What are the parents of a pregnant girl under age to do? What are the medical profession to do?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7140

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

The third applicant challenged the admissibility in the criminal proceedings of the statements made to the inspectors, but the judge held that, while the inspectors could ask incriminating questions and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317DEC000188218

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2020

17 mars 2020

White. 3.

Source officielle