CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

544 résultats pour « SHEFET Dan »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609DEC006254400

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2005

9 juin 2005

The court dismissed his request on the same day as unsubstantiated.

Source officielle

Page 9 sur 28

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0914DEC003444797

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2000

14 septembre 2000

On the same day the Sieradz District Court refused to quash the applicant’s detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0922JUD004005711

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2022

22 septembre 2022

    On 6 April 2010 the applicant complained to the Ministry of the Interior, stating that from about 2   p.m. until 7   p.m. on the previous day he had been arbitrarily detained by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930JUD003927198

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2004

30 septembre 2004

On the following day he was placed under pre-trial detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929DEC005179699

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2005

29 septembre 2005

Due to the large number of witnesses and experts the court was unable to conclude the hearing on that day and reconvened on the following day.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212JUD001579820

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2023

12 décembre 2023

    Following the applicant’s complaint, on the following day the police questioned M.P. and several witnesses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159300

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

K., his dad, Mr M.K., and his brother, Ye. He knew of the existence of his “other dad”, the applicant, but he did not remember him and did not want to have contacts with him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0515DEC005465900

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2006

15 mai 2006

On the same day she filed a complaint with the police and named the applicant as the perpetrator.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD001181802

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

    On the same day the Tychy District Prosecutor and a forensic expert examined Hubert Mojsiejew’s body.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0130JUD003888497

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2003

30 janvier 2003

However, it was clear from the findings of the investigation that there existed a “prima facie” danger of absconding, committing further offences, or obstructing the investigation, such a danger being

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD006684712

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2017

23 novembre 2017

of that danger.

Source officielle
TA

Reconduite à la frontière

DTA_2206299_20221229

Administratif

29 décembre 2022

29 décembre 2022

Ce même certificat précise que les thérapeutiques envisagées justifient un suivi en France puisque " la prise en charge dans son pays d'origine mettrait son pronostic vital en danger ".

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD004514214

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2016

12 juillet 2016

    On the same day the District Court dismissed the applicant’s application.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122148

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

The Almelo Regional Court ( rechtbank ) imposed the measure of placement in a Persistent Offenders Institution ( inrichting voor stelselmatige daders ) for the duration of two years on him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004038298

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

  A subjective assumption that a young person is in danger is not enough and irrelevant circumstances such as public order must not be the basis of a care order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD004815018

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2025

14 janvier 2025

Furthermore, the applicant noted that, being from a small town, news of his hunting licence being revoked by the police – due to allegations that he posed a danger to others and their property – spread

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC004881817

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

    At approximately 4.45 p.m. on the same day, that is to say fifteen minutes before the end of the voting in the western provinces, the Commission declared the ballot envelopes and ballot sheets

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD001777908

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

According to the first sentence of Article 534 § 3 of the CCP, due to the potential danger resulting from a delay (the meaning of the provision indicates that reference is made to danger to the person’

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0325JUD003119596

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1999

25 mars 1999

The court shall rule within a time-limit of three days from the filing of the appeal by means of a final decision.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324JUD002189493

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2005

24 mars 2005

The clash continued intermittently until 6 p.m. that day.

Source officielle