CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325DEC001078719
25 mars 2021
of the Convention concerning (1) the inadequate conditions of detention, (2) the authorities’ decision to allocate him to a remote establishment for the purposes of serving his sentence, and (3) the alleged
Page 9 sur 497
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD005301315
16 mai 2019
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 6. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68098-68566
16 novembre 1999
Summary of the facts Mr Van Pelt was convicted of drug trafficking and other drug-related offences by the Bobigny tribunal de grande instance on 22 February 1990.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177761
19 septembre 2017
font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 19 September 2017 FIRST SECTION Application no. 750/17 Petar
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD000831820
11 avril 2024
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 7.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC001819906
14 décembre 2010
The applicant had been imprisoned in cells of less than 3 m² per prisoner for an overall period of 835 days.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018DEC003114912
18 octobre 2022
DECISION Application no. 31149/12 Velimir DABETIĆ against Italy The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18 October 2022 as a Committee composed of: Péter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1008JUD005460915
8 octobre 2020
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC002136593
6 septembre 1995
The applicant returned to Munich accompanied by S.H. and entered into negotiations with Uli and Peter.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0210JUD004327416
10 février 2026
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( b ) OF THE CONVENTION Alleged violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) of the Convention in respect of the time allotted to the applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0610JUD001259017
10 juin 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 of the Convention 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC000751710
13 mai 2014
Alleged violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention 19.
ECLI:CEDH:001-247939
1 décembre 2025
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 22 December 2025 SECOND SECTION Application no. 61045/21 Péter
PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2804570-3071094
17 juillet 2009
person per month), it had been impossible for her to deposit the sums demanded (totalling EUR 555).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC005121116
6 septembre 2022
THE LAW Alleged violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the alleged unfairness of the proceedings 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0513DEC002105115
13 mai 2025
Alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD005627610
22 octobre 2015
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS RAISED UNDER WELL ‑ ESTABLISHED CASE ‑ LAW 12.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2012823-2139512
31 mai 2007
Violation of Article 6 § 1 (fairness) Maria Peter and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD005460211
12 janvier 2016
The first instance interim judgment was upheld by the Pest County Court on 5 January 2007. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0606DEC001954806
6 juin 2023
Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 6 of the Convention 17.