(“the applicant”), on 24   March   2004. 2.

A new appeal hearing was fixed for 21 March 2002. 19.     On 21 March 2002 the St.

On 9 March 2017 the SSD note was delivered to the applicant. He asked the SSD to provide him with the information on which it had based its findings but the SSD refused.

Marc, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de DOUAI, 6ème chambre, en date du 19 février 2004, qui, pour blessures involontaires, l'a condamné à 3 mois d'emprisonnement avec sursis et 2 000 euros d'amende

On 24 March 19998 the Celje District Court held a hearing. On 15 April 1998 the court issued a ruling finding ZT partially liable for the skiing accident.

France , 18 March 1997, § 34, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ II).

    In March 2008 the applicant, relying on the above-mentioned decision of 25 September 2006, initiated court proceedings against the local Bailiffs Service and the local office of the State

Thus, reasons had not been given for holding him liable, or for finding the applicant company liable, a decision that had resulted from the former finding.

At the time of the Constitutional Court's finding the relevant period lasted a little over 12   years.

their involvement in the bomb attack planned for 11 March 2008. 12.

MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil defamation proceedings instituted against the applicant, a journalist, and the publisher of the newspaper “Politis”, for an article published on 10 March

font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 6 April 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 37141/18 Dan BAHNARU against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 24 July 2018 communicated on 19 March

2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns administrative proceedings in which the administrative authorities, including the administrative courts, awarded the applicant a disability pension finding

On 25 March 2013, after separation from her partner, the applicant was awarded custody of their child (1 year and 4 months old at the time). That judgment became final on 10 July 2013.

The employer’s managing board (“the board”), by a decision of 19 March 1999, rejected the applicant’s objection of 18   March   1999 as out of time.

, finding that the UALC’s claims were unsubstantiated and that the property at issue belonged to the applicant.

It further observed that since 2 March 2004 the investigating authorities had received substantial documentary evidence in English, translations of which had been prepared between March and May 2004.

military service: no violation Facts – In August 2017 the applicant’s son (T.P.) died during a “heat march” (Hitzemarsch) while performing his compulsory military service.

In particular, did the SAC adduce relevant and sufficient reasons for the above-mentioned findings and conclusions relating to the funds originating from the applicant’s mother and former husband (see