The court confirmed the fact that large ‑ scale damage to the child’s brain had been caused during the labour. 25.

    Damage 39.

He further claimed EUR   2,000 of non-pecuniary damage. 37.

I was there arrested by a police constable and forcibly restrained. I was photographed under such restraint and against my will.

He was in constant contact with his parole officer, who had positively evaluated his return to society.

There they were handed over to their families and taken to individual rooms with firmly closed windows, where they were kept under constant supervision; they were not allowed to leave the rooms for the

They sought 20,000 Croatian kunas (HRK) [1] in respect of pecuniary damage and HRK 220,000 [2] each in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage.

applicant as requested, as well as of compensation for pecuniary damage (in the amount of 2,499.99 new Romanian lei (RON)) and non-pecuniary damage (in the amount of RON   150,000) for both parents

of pecuniary damage.

    Guidelines on the use of equipment in police surveillance operations (The Home Office Guidelines of 1984) provided that only chief constables or assistant chief constables were entitled to

    Damage 55.     In respect of pecuniary damage, the first and second applicants claimed the sum they had paid to the property’s former owners.

The Court awarded Michael Woditschka 15,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 10,888 for costs and expenses and Wolfgang Wilfling EUR 20,000 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 15,478 for costs

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded, unanimously, 35,000 pounds sterling (GBP) for pecuniary damage and GBP 20,000 for non-pecuniary damage to Mehmet Gül’s widow and children

En l'espèce, il est constant que le Dr I... , né en 1957 à Damas (Syrie), de nationalité française, a informé le 20 décembre 2012 la caisse primaire d'assurance maladie de la Corrèze de son installation

  Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures   a) Details of just satisfaction   Case and application number Judgment of Final on Pecuniary damage Non-pecuniary damage Costs and

    Damage 46.     The applicant claimed EUR 20,000 in respect of pecuniary damage.

It had been open to the applicant to bring an action for damages under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention against the Federal Republic of Germany or the Land of Bremen.

  Article 13 The Court noted that the applicants’ proceedings seeking damages for the forcible entry and its effect on them were unsuccessful.

  In its judgment today, the Court held unanimously that Bulgaria is to pay: Lubomira Nedkova Todorova EUR   80,000 for pecuniary damage, EUR   3000 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR