the meantime, on 25   April 2001 the Lviv regional prosecutor’s office had instituted criminal proceedings against Dr   I.P. in relation to suspected abuse of a position of authority and forgery

and Information Service ( Fiscale Inlichtingen- en Opsporingsdienst , “FIOD”) instituted an investigation into activities of the applicant companies and their director, Mr Wouterse, as they suspected forgery

of them holding management positions, together with external people and companies, had created an organised criminal group with the purpose of obtaining bank loans unlawfully and committing fraud, forgery

conspiracy to overthrow the Uzbek State’s constitutional order (Article   159   §   4), unlawful crossing of the State border (Article   223   §   3   (b)), repeated forgery

Nor were there any allegations of forgery. The judgment itself was valid and enforceable without any legal defect.

    On 24 March 1992 the Ankara prosecutor filed an indictment with the Ankara Criminal Court of First Instance, charging the applicant and another person with the offences of forgery and perverting

  Barbara Górecka was remanded in custody in April 2001 and later charged with 33 offences, notably being the leader of an organised criminal gang, aggravated assault, making threats and forgery.

appropriate until at least 10 years after departure for those convicted of serious offences such as violence against the person, sexual offences, burglary, robbery or theft, and other offences such as forgery

Forgione, avocat à Telese Terme. Le gouvernement italien («   le Gouvernement   ») est représenté par son agent, M me   E.   Spatafora. 3.

Espagne , n o 17512/90, décision du 6 juillet 1992, Décisions et rapports 73, p. 214, et Folgero et autres c. Norvège (déc.), n o   15472/02, 14   février 2006).

       On 9 September 1993 preliminary judicial investigations were initiated into allegations of forgery and fraud perpetrated by the applicant.

  In 1996 the bank for which he worked seized his accounts and lodged a criminal complaint against him, alleging embezzlement, forgery and uttering of private, commercial or banking documents, workplace

In May 1993 the applicant was questioned concerning an accusation against him of forgery.

    When the period of the applicant’s detention expired the applicant was arrested for an offence under section 8 of the Forgery Act 1913 and he was brought before the District Court where evidence

inhuman or degrading treatment), he complains about the conditions of his detention between 2001 and 2004 (when he was pardoned on humanitarian grounds) while serving a prison sentence for fraud and forgery

Ultimately, on 7 October 2003 the domestic courts convicted the director and head accountant of forgery and negligent bookkeeping and decided that they had not been accused or tried for offences which

They were charged with with forgery of official documents (Section 378 of the Criminal Code). At 7 p.m., the same day, the applicants appeared before a duty judge of the Kriva Palanka Basic Court.

follows:   Particular circumstances of the case:         On 6 November 1993 the Poznan-Nowe Miasto District Prosecutor (Prokurator Rejonowy) charged the applicant with forgery

  On 30 March 1992 criminal proceedings were instituted against her for fraud and forgery of official documents.