CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 348 résultats pour « Constance DAMAMME »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0907DEC002420007

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2010

7 septembre 2010

The sum referred to above, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable.

Page 89 sur 118

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1016JUD000560805

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2008

16 octobre 2008

In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, natural persons who did not directly cause the damage, but who created or contributed to creating the situation which allowed the damage to occur or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD000891805

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2016

22 novembre 2016

The text of the article and the portrayal of the prosecutor of the Primorskiy Region, [Mr V.], as an immoral and corrupt ‘prostitute-werewolf’ in an indecent and insulting manner damage the claimant’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD000414904

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2012

15 mars 2012

The applicant also requested compensation for the non-pecuniary damage he had sustained on account of the expressions contained in the dictionaries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1010JUD004103807

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2013

10 octobre 2013

The constant fetid smell in the cell made the applicant sick and gave him headaches. When it rained, water leaked into one of the corners and flooded the cell. The concrete floors were always damp.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130JUD002306512

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2018

30 janvier 2018

He claimed 25,000   Turkish liras (TRY) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and TRY 30,000 in respect of pecuniary damage. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0428JUD000171410

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2015

28 avril 2015

    Damage 60.     The applicant claimed 10,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 61.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD006515809

Admin. suprême

2 février 2016

2 février 2016

As a result, he had had to endure constant pain and hunger, he had lost almost 70 % of his teeth and had developed an ulcer and gastroduodenitis.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD002153907

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2012

17 avril 2012

    Damage 75.     The applicant company claimed compensation for pecuniary damage, consisting in the amount of the surcharge it had had to pay. 76.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD002405111

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2017

25 juillet 2017

Developed vascular disease (vascular angiopathy of the lower extremities) and encephalopathy, an irreversible brain damage ... were signs of his worsening health.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000059107

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

    Damage 81.     The applicant claimed 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary and EUR   50,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 82.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2013

26 mars 2013

compensate the aggrieved person for all the damage suffered, including any non-pecuniary damage (Article 6.283).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1023REP002198793

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1995

23 octobre 1995

There could be various causes of such damage, such as a tumour, stretching, and pressure by tumoral pulling or external trauma.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607JUD000027705

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

Article   13 also allows a State to choose between a remedy which can expedite pending proceedings or a remedy post factum in damages for delay that has already occurred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0322DEC003520703

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2005

22 mars 2005

For example, in Prison No. 3, there has been a constant increase in the number of recorded active cases, from 54 in January 2000 to 121 in June 2001).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD004341106

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2020

22 septembre 2020

Damage 92.     The first and the second applicants claimed 50,000 euros (EUR) and EUR   5,000 respectively in respect of compensation for non-pecuniary damage.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324JUD001181802

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

This immobilisation technique, if applied for a longer time, could lead directly to death, but if applied for a shorter period of time could cause brain damage, which affected breathing and after a certain

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0618JUD003562710

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2020

18 juin 2020

Was any pecuniary damage sustained...? – “None.” 3. Was there physical violence or a threat of such violence? What exactly happened?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1113JUD002318315

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2018

13 novembre 2018

    On 16 April 2012 he lodged a claim with the Tartu Administrative Court requesting compensation for non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 30,000 euros (EUR), based on the same complaints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0310REP001480789

Admin. suprême

10 mars 1994

10 mars 1994

  It claimed compensation for the damage it had suffered from the activities and declarations of the Municipality and of the Mayor.   27.

Source officielle