Indeed, the proceedings had only ended because the applicant had withdrawn her enforcement request.

The court also found that the applicant had again obstructed the proceedings because he refused to be transported to the court hearing without a wheelchair.

The Minister for Finance replied that because of the difficulties this would lead to it was not possible to make the benefit retrospective.

Composition de la Cour lors du délibéré : - Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président - Françoise CLEMENT, conseiller - Vincent NICOLAS, conseiller Signé par Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président, et par Sylvie BOURRAT

If the applicant had not recommended her, any future conflict would have been excluded because he would not have had to work with her.

In particular, she alleges that her employer was able to trace her identity because the Department of Social Security refused to give her a new National Insurance number, that the department’s records

  On 4 May 1993 the court stayed the proceedings because the petitioner had died. On 21 May 1993 E.D. appealed against the decision to stay the proceedings.

It postponed one as an expert and witnesses had failed to appear, and another because the applicant’s second lawyer could not attend.

He held a residency permit for some time, which was later withdrawn because of his criminal convictions.

In 2007 and 2008, the proceedings were adjourned and then resumed on several occasions because one of the co-defendants was taken ill.

The proceedings were adjourned on many occasions: for a total of almost ten months because of the absence of the defendant company’s representative and for another three months during which the company

  Individual measures:   -   The Government considers no further individual measures are required because the violation of Article 8 was held to be in procedural aspects only.

It invited the court to reject the appeal because the applicant could not be considered to have any legal interest in its outcome. 10.

In determining whether the interference was “necessary in a democratic society”, the applicant could not claim contact rights under German civil law in force at that time because he was neither the child

Ms K.Ś.L.’s call is deceitful ( oszukańczy ) because [she] does not want to create any law for the protection of animals.

He then spat on R.M.’s car and swore because R.M. had allegedly been driving too fast and had caused dust to fly up.

Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicant further complained that she had been convicted solely because she had made use of her right to silence and the privilege not to incriminate herself

the court has identified a cause that removes the criminal nature of the act, or because one of the constitutive elements of an unlawful act is missing, the court can award material and moral damage in

xa0; The Court may declare inadmissible in accordance with the Convention any cases pertaining to “old” foreign-currency savings in which the applicants have not obtained verification certificates, because

The applicant alleged that Mr   Durdynets, who was acting Prime Minister at the time, dismissed Mr Stoginenko because of his involvement in financing Polityka .