Germany (application no. 26958/07)   REJECTION OF AN APPLICATION CONCERNING THE REFUSAL TO RELEASE A DETAINEE ON PROBATION   Principal facts   The applicant, Rolf Friedrich Meixner, is a

  Principal Facts   Senator Lines GmbH is a maritime transport firm, a limited company incorporated under German law, based in Bremen (Germany).

officers and shortcomings of the ensuing criminal investigation, as well as under Article 8 of the Convention about the alleged violation of his right to respect for his home were communicated to the German

Germany , 25 March 1985, § 48, Series A no. 90). There is no indication that the application of the domestic law by the German courts was in any way arbitrary.

That refusal was confirmed by the German courts which had based their decisions on the following grounds.

Germany (dec.) - 3443/18 Decision 7.9.2021 [Section III] Article 35 Article 35-1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Complaint aimed at not applying a federal statutory provision in applicant’s case lodged

  Assessing various factors, the Court considered that Mr Ringeisen should be afforded just satisfaction and in a judgment of 22 June 1972 fixed at 20 000 German marks   the overall sum to be

First name LAST NAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative   Peter ROTH 1960 German Straubing       Application no. 30776/18   No.

  8819/16) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a German

Germany - 68125/14 and 72204/14 Judgment 22.3.2018 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Alleged procedural failings in the domestic court’s decision to remove children from their parents

Germany - 11308/16 and 11344/16 Judgment 22.3.2018 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Alleged procedural failings in the domestic court’s decision to remove children from their parents

    The applicant moved from Denmark to Germany in July 1980 as a consequence of his taking over the control of a firm situated in Germany.

E... et son épouse la co-gérance non salariée d'une succursale de détail alimentaire ; que le 14 mars 2009, elle a confié à M.

X... engagé suivant contrat du 20 juin 1989 en qualité de gérant non salarié de la société Textile Direct Distribution (TDD) pour assurer la gestion d'un magasin de vente au détail de cette société a été

As regards a special complaint alleging inaction , this remedy had no statutory basis in German law.

normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  THE FACTS   Whereas the facts presented by the Applicant may be summarised as follows:   The Applicant is a German

normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  THE FACTS   Whereas the facts presented by the Applicant may be summarised as follows:   The Applicant is a German

The applicant was travelling by aeroplane to Munich with a valid German passport and an expired Romanian passport.

    Relevant provision of the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) Article 101, § 1, second sentence, of the German Basic Law provides that no one shall be deprived of his right to a decision rendered