CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

11 119 résultats pour « Behague »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

Cour d'Appel

6253ca62bd3db21cbdd8ae12

Appel

28 janvier 2008

28 janvier 2008

Antoine MOREL, Président de chambre, Président, Mme Danielle DEMONT- PIEROT, Conseillère, Mme Monique BEHARY-LAUL-SIRDER, Conseillère. qui en ont délibéré.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253ca82bd3db21cbdd8b38d

Appel

28 janvier 2008

28 janvier 2008

Antoine MOREL, Président de chambre, Président, rédacteur Mme Danielle DEMONT-PIEROT, Conseillère, Mme Monique BEHARY-LAUL-SIRDER, Conseillère. qui en ont délibéré.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC003003408

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2021

21 janvier 2021

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit the observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147129

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2014

9 juillet 2014

844 );   Having also examined the communications submitted on 26 November 2013 and 20 May 2014 by the “Collective of victims of terrorism in the Basque Country”, acting in their own name and on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107DEC003408010

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2017

7 novembre 2017

Ertürk, the applicant’s representative at that time, submitted an application form on his behalf and indicated her personal address as her contact information.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC000163412

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2016

17 mai 2016

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222482

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2022

15 décembre 2022

The decision stated that as established by the Internal Security Agency the applicant had been engaged in espionage on behalf of Russia, which threatened the security of the State.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0603DEC003118508

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2021

3 juin 2021

the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (“eComms”), no reply was received to the Registry’s letter of 12   October 2020, requesting the applicant’s lawyer to submit written observations on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2919

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2007

8 janvier 2007

The applicant, claiming that he had lost all ties with the child, requested the attorney-general's office to initiate an action to disclaim paternity on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510DEC007629014

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2016

10 mai 2016

By letter dated 12 January 2016, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was advised that the period allowed for submission of observations on behalf of the applicant had expired on 23

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002DEC003450903

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2007

2 octobre 2007

treatment and which he signed without having read it as he was illiterate, the applicant accepted that he had been a member of the PKK [1] and had carried out a number of illegal activities on its behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117DEC006844401

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2008

17 janvier 2008

The court confirmed the fact that during the period from 15 May 1990 until 20 February 1992 the applicant had made deposits on behalf of himself and his two children with the Grozny branch of the USSR

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC006277515

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

Or, dans l’affaire Beraru c.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528DEC005023099

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2002

28 mai 2002

The public prosecutor stated that the applicants had been able to question witness N., whereas the two other officers could not be considered as witnesses who would give evidence on the applicants’ behalf

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1737892-1822253

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2006

27 juillet 2006

She complained on her own behalf and on behalf of her son, Khadzhi-Murat Yandiyev, born on 27 August 1975.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC001124003

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

On an unspecified date, the mayor of Kılıçlı filed a petition, on behalf of the residents, with the office of the Prime Minister and requested permission to return to their village.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1251945-1314705

Admin. suprême

8 février 2005

8 février 2005

Russie (n o 49491/99)   Non-violation de l’article 5 §§ 1, 2 et 4 Le requérant, Igor Alexandrovitch Bordovski, est un ressortissant bélarussien né en 1967 et résidant à Gomel (Bélarus).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC000331006

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2011

15 novembre 2011

    On 8 February 2005 Vizkon Ltd instituted proceedings on behalf of the State against the first applicant, seeking to oblige him to allow a valuation of his house and sign an agreement on the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC004270205

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2010

29 juin 2010

agreement which, inter alia , authorised the former to negotiate directly with the owners of the property subject to expropriation and, should such negotiations fail, to institute court proceedings on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123827

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2013

11 juillet 2013

    However, the return order was again quashed by the Supreme Court, on 27   July 2011, following an extraordinary appeal on points of law lodged by the Prosecutor General on behalf of

Source officielle

Page 88 sur 556

← PrécédentSuivant →