CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC000662703
1 avril 2008
On 5 May 1992 a motion to determine the ownership title to plot no. 420/3 in the Lysá nad Labem cadastral area was drawn up together with R. and filed in the court’s records.
Page 87 sur 351
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010DEC001508320
10 octobre 2024
Bryansk Regional Court on 4 September 2018, the Court notes that the court at first level of jurisdiction heard the applicant, questioned him on the merits of his complaint and accepted additional motions
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4296
3 juin 2004
Article 13 (examined by the Court of its own motion) – In the course of the domestic investigation in respect of the police officers, opened following the applicants’ complaint, certain of the accused
ECLI:CEDH:002-10366
10 février 2015
Finally, despite prompting by the first applicant, it refused to define of its own motion concrete boundaries within which travel could be permitted.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198347
11 octobre 2019
She emphasised that the decision to close the court only concerned the hearing on 10 August 2018 and had no continuing effect; in the absence of another motion to close the court in future, any further
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55869
24 juillet 2000
by the Government of the United Kingdom on 20 November 1998; Whereas in its judgment of 12 October 1999 the Court: - held, unanimously, that it is not necessary to consider of its own motion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0527DEC000570102
27 mai 2004
Throughout the criminal proceedings, either on its own motion or at the applicant's request, the State Security Court examined and ordered the applicant's continued detention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161271
8 février 2016
On 10 January 2001 the hierarchical prosecutor attached to the Bihor Prosecutor’s Office quashed the decision of 29 November 2000 on its own motion and ordered that the criminal proceedings against
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1208DEC003453516
8 décembre 2022
Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (see the appended table for the relevant dates), the friendly settlement procedure being set in motion
ECLI:CEDH:001-233701
15 avril 2024
the lack of protection afforded to the second applicant, and the failure of the judge to inform the parties of her situation with the opposing party’s lawyer and/or abstain from the case of her own motion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118DEC003467316
18 janvier 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527DEC004590920
27 mai 2025
did not raise an objection based on non ‑ compliance with the six-month time-limit applicable at the relevant time, the Court reiterates that this is an issue which it must examine of its own motion
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1205DEC004620515
5 décembre 2024
It is to be recalled that whenever an applicant omits, contrary to Rule 44C § 1 of the Rules of Court, to divulge relevant information of his or her own motion, depending on the particular
ECLI:CEDH:001-55638
19 octobre 1995
Anxious to ensure the proper execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 10 February 1995, the French Government set in motion the payment procedure
ECLI:CEDH:001-244757
4 août 2025
Constitutional Court found that the impugned provisions of the 2020 amendments were not in breach of the right to human dignity or the right to respect for private life and accordingly dismissed a judicial motion
Juge Libertés Détention
69dd32a7cdc6046d471e9f0a
2 avril 2026
demandé à être entendu par le juge du tribunal judiciaire et l'audience avec audition de l'intéressé a été fixée au 02 avril 2026 au sein du centre hospitalier et mise en délibéré le même jour, Vu la motion
ECLI:CEDH:001-138855
8 novembre 2013
may be] ordered by the investigating judge or a three-judge panel is one month from the date of [a person’s] deprivation of liberty. (2) If there is a valid reason the investigating judge may, upon a motion
Rétention Administrative
69d5ee54cdc6046d477c029f
7 avril 2026
interjeté le 06 Avril 2026 à 16h46 par Monsieur [B] [A] ; A l'audience, Régulièrement convoqué Monsieur [B] [A] n'a pas souhaité comparaître ; Le retenu n'est assisté d'aucun conseil, une motion
Tribunal Administratif de Grenoble
DTA_2510137_20260401
1 avril 2026
Par un mémoire en défense enregistré le 24 novembre 2025, la commune de Pont-en-Royans et la SMACL représentées par Me Mollion, demandent au juge des référés : 1°) leur mise hors de cause ; 2
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:C100039
15 janvier 2020
Attendu que la motion de l'assemblée générale du barreau de Toulouse, transmise au tribunal, indique que toutes désignations par le bâtonnier de l'ordre des avocats pour les audiences étrangers sont suspendues