It further noted that specific criteria had to be met under section   133 of the 1988 Act for the right to compensation to arise, namely: the claimant had to have been convicted, she had to have suffered

for which the applicant had been elected had ceased to exist after the entry into force of the new Constitution.

members had outvoted him.

It held that the applicant had not known the identity of the people who had caused him damage, only that they had been members of the Croatian army.

He had learnt from A.I.’s father that A.I. had been arrested. Subsequently, he had called P.M. and complained to him of what had happened. He had reminded P.M. and J.S.

    The Government argued that the Court of Cassation had addressed the main argument raised by the applicants and had explained why it had considered Government Decision no. 974/2002 to be a

The experts concluded that the bullet had been fired upwards by the officer and had not struck the victim directly, but had been deflected by a stone thrown at the jeep by another demonstrator.

of a conversation the psychiatrist had had with a police officer seven months earlier.

The journalist reported a discussion she had had with two MPs, one of whom was the applicant.

Although they agreed that he had died from asphyxiation, they differed in respect of what had been its cause: some medical reports found that he had been inadequately immobilised with belts on the chest

It was noted that numerous witnesses had been questioned, face-to-face interrogations had been held and forensic medical examinations had been performed.

She submitted that although she had not lived together with W.K. they had maintained a common household.

Although the investigating judge, who had tried to trace the applicants, had not remained inactive, there was nothing to explain why no attempt had been made to find the applicants at the address they

The very fact that a programme of such magnitude had had to be put in place showed that the economic crisis and its effect on the State budget balance had been exceptional in nature.

  Paragraph 1 Applicant had been living in country in which his parents, brothers and sisters resided and had never broken off relations with them – deportation had resulted in his being separated

The two women had therefore fought back, and she had pulled her step-father’s hair but had not hit him; she had not seen her mother strike him with the paper-knife.

She submitted that they had failed to indicate what remedy she had to exhaust.

They had therefore done what, in their view, had been in the applicant’s best interests.

Furthermore, prior to S.N.’s questioning by the police, Ch. had not claimed that the applicant had murdered N. He had only admitted that he had discovered N. and called the ambulance for him.