(right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and   13 (right to an effective remedy), Mr Šulcas complains about the excessive length of criminal proceedings brought against him for fraud, forgery

While upholding the applicant’s conviction for abuse of office, organised crime, and forgery of official documents, the court discontinued the proceedings concerning the charges of bribery and remitted

On 30 April 2008 the District Court in Valjevo dismissed the applicant’s request for criminal investigation filed on 4 June 2007 against private persons for alleged criminal offence of perjury and forgery

    On 21 February 2005 the Town Court, presided by Judge D., convicted the applicant of robbery and forgery, sentenced him to seven years and four months of imprisonment and ordered his detention

In February 1998 he was arrested on suspicion of fraud and forgery and, convicted as charged in December 2008, was sentenced to just over eight years and two months’ imprisonment.

    In 1997 Italian courts found the applicant guilty of forgery of documents and sentenced him to one year and six months’ imprisonment and a fine.

    The Court considers that, even if the application lodged by the applicant company had been declared admissible, it is not a foregone conclusion that it would have succeeded in the Supreme

  Mr Sossoadouno was arrested in January 2003 on suspicion of conspiracy, forgery, abduction and attempted blackmail. The proceedings against him are currently pending.

  Following a complaint by the Sodepe auditor, a preliminary investigation was opened into allegations of forgery of private documents, uttering and misappropriation of assets.

He was charged with fraud, larceny, forgery and abuse of trust. 7.     On 8 October 1996 the first hearing was held.

In the framework of the new criminal case, the applicant was formally charged with the offences under Articles 179.3.2, 306.2, 308.1, 308.2, 311.3.1, 311.3.2, 311.3.3 and 313 (forgery in public office)

        On 21 July 1994 the District Court of Stockholm convicted the first applicant on several counts of aggravated fraud and attempted aggravated fraud by means of forgery

On 19 September, he was convicted of forgery. He was sentenced to eighteen months’ imprisonment and deportation proceedings against him were initiated.

he was charged with obtaining property by deception ( sukčiavimas ) under Article 274 of the Criminal Code, abuse of office ( piktnaudžiavimas tarnyba ) under Article 285 of the Code, and official forgery

It is to be noted that in part N.G.’s allegations of forgery against the applicants were voiced in reply to similar charges that the applicants had brought against him in the second criminal proceedings

its initial registration, the registration was cancelled owing to the absence of any record in the customs register concerning the vehicle’s customs clearance (such absence being treated as proof of forgery

    On 22 June 1998 the prosecutor attached to the Bucharest Court of Appeal indicted the applicant on several accounts of fraud and forgery. 11.

As for his anxiety and resentment concerning his condition and the military service in general, the Court considers that they could not be considered as the forerunner of an imminent risk of suicide (see

As matters transpired, the representations were untrue and the car registration papers were a forgery.