CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0710DEC001714290
10 juillet 1991
they welcomed the Government's offer, the application would not be withdrawn as they wanted a declaration that the original refusal of arrangements had been in breach of their Convention rights and damages
Page 87 sur 118
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0403JUD000184323
3 avril 2025
Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD003666817
15 décembre 2022
date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD003159015
12 janvier 2023
end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated by national authorities Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
Chojnackic/Pologne
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD006207611
20 juillet 2017
Il suffit, même en l’absence de constat formel, d’une motivation donnant à penser que le juge considère l’intéressé comme coupable (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Puig Panella c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1013JUD007564514
13 octobre 2022
Representative’s name and location Means of transport Start and end date Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD000321520
11 juillet 2024
xa0; Representative’s name and location Detention facility Period of detention Specific circumstances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0420DEC003735597
20 avril 1999
In 1996 and 1997 the applicants instituted several sets of civil proceedings in the courts of Vratsa and Vidin claiming damages for allegedly unlawful acts and decisions of various State
2ème chambre (formation à 3)
DCA_23BX00219_20250227
27 février 2025
A en l'absence de constat officiel de sa maladie au cours d'une période ouvrant droit à ce bénéfice ; la dermatose de M.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2027556-2141648
7 juin 2007
Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicant 20,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 105 for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0908DEC001337287
8 septembre 1988
After the killing the applicant tried to commit suicide but only hurt himself seriously, causing some brain damage and necessitating his hospitalisation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD003127316
18 janvier 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0113JUD003200916
13 janvier 2022
introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD004802012
30 novembre 2021
The applicant submitted that in light of the Court’s constant case-law both respondent Governments had jurisdiction. 19.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD004514214
12 juillet 2016
The experts were also asked to establish whether contact between N. and his father could damage N.’s health or psychological development. 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319JUD004908910
19 mars 2019
Damage 70. The applicant claimed 12,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. 71.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0505JUD000359419
5 mai 2020
It also mentioned that she had mobilised and motivated the personnel under her supervision through constant communication and personal example, encouraging good performances from them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0119JUD006004113
19 janvier 2017
Damage 66.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429JUD003171221
29 avril 2025
Damage 53. Ms Yerokh claimed 20,000 euros (EUR) and the rest of the applicants each claimed EUR 16,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. 54.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC002175293
21 mai 1997
According to the constant case-law of the Constitutional Court and the Administrative Court Section 8 of the General Administrative Procedure Act only grants procedural