AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003021496
23 mars 1999
23 mars 1999
Therefore, all the judges of both the first instance and appeal courts should have been disqualified from dealing with his case.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC006181114
25 septembre 2018
25 septembre 2018
The lawyers representing both parties attended. 15. The applicant’s wife came to the court and attended the hearing. The applicant did not attend. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120DEC001824902
20 janvier 2004
20 janvier 2004
It concluded that in fact both L. and the applicant were fit as custodians.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229903
30 novembre 2023
30 novembre 2023
trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in both
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146460
28 août 2014
28 août 2014
The applicant alleges that the court hearings both before the Justice of the Peace and the district court have been conducted in the absence of the party for the prosecution, because the administrative
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD004838217
21 janvier 2021
21 janvier 2021
The applicants submitted that the relevant maintenance was due in terms of both the law and the contract. 7.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1812973-1901905
13 octobre 2006
13 octobre 2006
The applicant moved out in November 1992, but remained in close contact with both his partner and son.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2877
1 février 2007
1 février 2007
Both were subsequently convicted of bankruptcy related offences.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2879
1 février 2007
1 février 2007
Both were subsequently convicted of bankruptcy related offences.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC006703001
28 mars 2006
28 mars 2006
The applicants are both represented before the Court by Mr P. Schmidl, a lawyer practising in Bratislava. The respondent Government are represented by Mrs A. Poláčková, their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109491
2 janvier 2012
2 janvier 2012
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of the alleged unfairness of both sets of proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412DEC004015109
12 avril 2011
12 avril 2011
17 October 2008, 12 February 2009 and 12 May 2009 four requests were addressed respectively by the applicant to the State Audit Council asking for a hearing date to be fixed as soon as possible for both
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-500
7 juin 2011
7 juin 2011
The property is located within sight of a church and a manor house, both of which are classed as historical monuments.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1174
15 décembre 2009
15 décembre 2009
Law – Article 2: (a) Substantive aspect – In their reports on the accident, the court-appointed experts had concluded that both the structure of the station and the manner in which it was
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11413
7 mars 2017
7 mars 2017
The applicants then submitted a formal request that both paternity cases be reopened in order to formally establish E.’s fatherhood.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-123807
11 juillet 2013
11 juillet 2013
in wording such as: “together you have received piles of public funds for your foundations”; “together you have privatized newspapers and publishing houses with approval from those whom you did not bother
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186604
4 septembre 2018
4 septembre 2018
The applicant, who meanwhile became aware of the judgment of 5 November 2010, lodged appeals against both the detention order and the judgment itself.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12019
27 février 2018
27 février 2018
Under the Romanian legal system, organic laws were enacted on a majority vote by the members of both Chambers of Parliament, whereas ordinary legislation was enacted by a majority of members present.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206001
12 octobre 2020
12 octobre 2020
Both applicants underwent a medical examination which recorded the injuries they had suffered.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206188
20 octobre 2020
20 octobre 2020
On 31 December 2009 and 15 January 2010, respectively, the URC announced that the private company Corporation KRT had won both tenders.
Source officiellePage 87 sur 1534