After taking over the messaging application, Telegram Messenger Inc. maintained the complaints and expressed intention to pursue them following Telegram Messenger LLP’s dissolution on their behalf and

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit written observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

The Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits were forwarded to the applicants’ representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicants.

The Constitutional Court considered that, in a situation where the authority form accompanying the constitutional complaint empowered an attorney office (legal person) to act on the applicant’s behalf

Electronic Communications Service (eComms) inviting it to inform the Court whether the applicant party had been dissolved and if there were any legal successors willing to pursue the application on its behalf

Although the applicant had lodged the application in her private capacity and not on behalf of the association she represented, the information she sought to obtain was directly related to her work in

Article 41 – No memorial on the merits was submitted on behalf of the applicants and no claim for just satisfaction was submitted until a late stage.

deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS Application no. 40012/08 was lodged by Mr Clinton Allotey Kpapoe – the first applicant –, a Ghanaian national who was born in 1960 and lives in Amsterdam, also on behalf

  During certain negotiations, the applicant company's managing director and the bank's branch manager acted on an equal footing, both being empowered to negotiate on behalf of their respective parties

By a letter dated 18 November 2024 the applicant’s representative was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant by 20   December   2024.

special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention and the Protocols thereto, even assuming that the applicant’s heirs have standing to pursue the application on his behalf

2021 and the court-ordered advisory opinion of the probation and social rehabilitation service ( reclasseringsadvies ) of 30 June 2021, both of which were submitted to the courts on the applicant’s behalf

well-being duly protected during his imprisonment, by providing him with prompt and adequate medical care, in particular with regard to his significant weight loss (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf

The application was also brought on behalf of the first and second applicants’ four younger children, who were still under age at the time the application was introduced.

Law : Article 8 – The Government had not contested the right of the applicant to bring a complaint on behalf of his wife and in that connection it was open to him, as a close relative of the victim, to

(b)   In respect of the son: not established that mother prevented from appealing against restrictions on his behalf. Conclusion : no violation (five votes to four). IV.

The prosecutor intervened on the applicant’s behalf in the courts, and on 19 June 2015 the Central District Court of Chelyabinsk ordered the Ministry to supply the outstanding 240   nappies.

    Was the applicant able to examine certain witnesses for the prosecution or to obtain the examination of certain witnesses on his behalf, as required by Article   6 §3   (d) of the

For the most part of the proceedings before the Court, his mother, initially indicated as his representative, corresponded with the Registry on his behalf.