Because of this practice he created an area in which operations like the present one were seen as normal and a common practice.

The request was made because the authorities thought that there was no prison in the Bahamas where the applicant could serve his sentence.

In April 2000 a senior investigator discontinued the proceedings against the applicant because no criminal offence had been committed.

In 1969 his mother had transferred the title of the property to his brother but in the applicant’s view this contract had been null and void because his mother had not been the sole owner.

As to the applicants’ argument that there was no link between the committed offence and the acquired assets, the court dismissed it finding that it was not necessary to establish such a link because all

This was so because the first applicant had blurred the distinction between him and the applicant companies and acted in bad faith in certain dealings.

The Constitutional Court later revoked those provisions because there were no constitutionally admissible reasons for interfering with the rights of the creditors (decision U-I-307/11 of 12 April 2012)

    The Court notes that in so far as the applicant’s length complaint concerns the period before 13 March 2013, it is inadmissible for non ‑ exhaustion of domestic remedies because in

The hearing of 13 November was adjourned because on that day lawyers practising in the Naples District were on strike.

On 10 December 1991 the Prefecture of Rodopi informed the Ministry that it had not examined the applicant's application because the latter had failed to submit a certified photocopy of the document which

Four hearings were rescheduled because the defence did not appear, four were cancelled because the prosecution could not attend, and several others could not take place for other reasons. 3 .

right in this context, and partly because the subject matter of the complaint was essentially the same as that of cases previously adjudicated by the Constitutional Court.

Furthermore, the applicants did not suffer any damage because of the article. 7 .

    The Government asked the Court to strike the application out because the applicant’s letters to the Court contained insults.

On 17 November 2004, the Mühlhausen Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s motion to terminate the proceedings because of the length of the proceedings.

The hearing scheduled for 6 January 1999 was adjourned because of the sickness of one of the co-accused.

On 5 April 2002 the Centru District Court prolonged his remand until 18   June 2002, finding that detention was necessary because: “The grounds on which the detention on remand was ordered remain

He had also stated that he did not start the fire because of the debt T.B. owed the applicant. He then refused to testify any further.

The case was listed for 2 March and 20 July 2001 but could not proceed on either occasion because the expert witnesses were not present.

Contributions to the National Insurance Fund could not be equated to contributions to a private pension scheme, because the money was used, together with money provided from general taxation, to finance