Considérant, en premier lieu, qu'à l'appui de leur demande de réparation, les requérants ont mis en cause la responsabilité pour faute de l'Etat ; qu'ils soutiennent, en effet, qu'était fautif le fait

Faits et procédure 1. Il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué et des pièces de la procédure ce qui suit. 2.

La société AEM fait grief à l'arrêt de la débouter de sa demande en garantie formée contre la société Groupama, alors « que la garantie est, selon le choix des parties, déclenchée soit par le fait dommageable

In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ... ... 3.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1973 and lives in Van. 6.

    In the determination ... of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ... . ... ... 3.

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.     Criminal proceedings against the applicant 6.     The applicant was born in 1986 and lives in Tekirdağ. 7.

No violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses) (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

, namely his right to a fair trial in determination of the criminal charge against him (compare Zeynalov v.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5 .

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1971 and lives in Çorum. 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in the village of Khodorkivtsi, Ukraine. 6.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1972 and lives in Diyarbakır. A.

THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Šibenik. 6.

Violation of Article 6+6-1 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Right to a fair trial;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Yet the court had ignored this fact as well as the fact that R.H. had had a motive to engineer a false indictment against the applicant. 38.

    The applicant alleged that he had not had a fair trial on account of the denial of his right to a lawyer while in police custody and the fact that his conviction had rested entirely on his

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1970 and is serving a sentence in Batman prison. A.