Thus, States which, like Serbia, have opted for a remedy designed both to expedite proceedings and afford compensation are free to award amounts which – while being lower than those awarded by the Court

The only lawyer from the applicant’s city, who had been placed in the high disciplinary tribunal’s composition in the first set of proceedings, recused himself at their start and was replaced.

The statement had been accompanied by an explicit statement to the effect that there had been no indication of an abuse by the applicant company of its access to patient data so far.

The same inconsistency was apparent in earlier statements by the Minister.

    The DNA report became ready about five months after the start of the investigation, on 14 December 2013.

As he did not do so, Perugia District State Counsel was asked on 18 December 2000 to start enforcement proceedings. The first attempt at enforcement was unsuccessful, as Mr P. had no possessions.

Moreover, he was instructed to start drug therapy. 10.

On 5 September 1994 it invited the Health Board’s statement, which was received on 5 October 1994.

LXXXVII of 1990 on price setting during a state of danger (see paragraph 11 below).

[the applicant's] written statement. 3. Mr K's written statement. 4. Mr P's written statement... {Inquirer P's signature}” 13 .

  A United States army truck, driven by witness M., had been temporarily prevented from moving past the sit-in.

On 2 November 2004 the applicant renewed his request for enforcement of the above judgment, this time in respect of the respondent State. 13.

    State responsibility for unlawful acts and omissions Section 1 of the State Responsibility for Damage Act of 1988 („Закон за отговорността на държавата за вреди, причинени на граждани“),

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLEs 8 and 14 OF THE CONVENTION (the statements made by m.) 23.

On 15 May 2007, while the Secretary of State was considering the case, the United States Embassy in London issued Diplomatic Note No.

  These statements were confirmed in particular by the statements made by the other participants in the offences in question as well as by the statements of the victims as to the stolen goods.

The public prosecutor filed an indictment charging the two policemen with ill-treatment under Article 243 of the Criminal Code, on the basis of the applicant's statements taken while he was being questioned

It held that the applicant had acted in bad faith by renouncing the inheritance while being insolvent and owing money to the claimants.

As to the applicants’ defence it considered that their intention was irrelevant, what was of relevance was whether the plaintiffs were identifiable.