Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - award

Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Ledi Bianku, President,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,   Ivana Jelić, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private

Germany - 497/09 Judgment 19.7.2012 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Refusal by the German courts to examine the merits of an application by a man whose wife had just committed

Violation of Article 14+8-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life;Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life)

In particular, any interference with her right to respect for private life was necessary in a democratic society for the protection of health and life and thus also for the protection of the rights of

Violation of Article 14+8-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life. ... . 2.

Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Ledi Bianku, President,   Paul Lemmens,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private

Law – Article 8: The failure to invalidate the applicant’s driving licence, which had enabled others to abuse his identity, constituted an interference with his right to respect for his private life.

Violation of Article 14+8 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life;Article 8-1 - Respect for private life);Non-pecuniary damage - award

Romania - 61496/08 Judgment 12.1.2016 [Section IV] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Monitoring of an employee’s use of the Internet at his

Il se plaignait en outre d’avoir été privé de l’accès effectif à une juridiction du fait de l’absence de notification individuelle de l’arrêté d’inscription.

marque "Comfort Inn" figurait expressément parmi les "marques Choice Hotels" (art. 2.2), "désignées sous la dénomination collective marques déposées" (art. 2.5) ; qu'il en était de même de la marque "Primevère

They also complained of a breach of their privacy by the media and the authorities, who had gained access to G. during his stay in hospital, widely disseminated private information about the applicants

This constituted interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life.

[R] [C] (gérant ABG holding) [Adresse 4] Mme [R] née [S] [M] (gérante ABG HOLDING) [Adresse 4] non comparant JUGEMENT DESIGNATION DU COMMISSAIRE PRISEUR Les parties ont été régulièrement appelées par

[5] venant aux droits de la SAS [7] prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité au siège social sis [Adresse 3] [Adresse 3] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Michel PRADEL

Décision déférée à la cour : Jugement rendu le 09 Juin 2023 par le pôle social du tribunal judiciaire de VERSAILLES N° RG : 21/00965 Copies exécutoires délivrées à : Me Camille-Frédéric PRADEL