CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 269 résultats pour « Forgeron »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0314DEC003983298

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2002

14 mars 2002

P. for forgery of customs’ declarations for importation of cars, one of which was the car of the applicant.

Source officielle

Page 86 sur 114

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC001779891

Admin. suprême

28 février 1996

28 février 1996

Court (Landesgericht) issued two warrants of arrest against the applicant and her former husband on charges of aggravated fraud, fraudulent conversion, contravention of the Social Security Act and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-96833

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

The Bulgarian authorities indicated that these actions concerned examination of witnesses in the framework of criminal proceedings opened in 2008 on indications of forgery of documents regarding the registration

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201JUD004021908

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

The bill of indictment comprised charges of fraud and forgery of documents. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120076

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2013

30 avril 2013

On 9 July 2007 the prosecutor discontinued criminal proceedings against the applicant on charges of organisation of forgery of documents and use of such documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD000296213

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2016

8 novembre 2016

    On 10 January 2002 an investigation was opened against the applicant for embezzlement, forgery and abuse of his official position as Minister for Agriculture.

Source officielle
CC

civ3

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C300617

Cassation

29 mai 2013

29 mai 2013

contre la société Le Parc de Passy, la SMABTP, la société Axa France IARD, la société Axa France corporate solutions assurance, la société MMA IARD assurances mutuelles, la société Socotec, la société Fougerolle

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD002538112

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2015

21 juillet 2015

District Court (“the District Court”) opened an investigation against the applicant, who was suspected of having participated in aggravated murder with unauthorised use of another person’s vehicle and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223810

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

state of health and challenged authenticity of the document submitted by the authorities as an IVS medical record, pointing to the lack of a title page, dates or signatures on it, and alleging its forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323JUD006350100

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2006

23 mars 2006

The Government submitted that by asserting a right which had arisen as a result of his unfair behaviour and the forgery of documents, the applicant had misled the domestic courts and abused his right of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210DEC004735306

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

    On unspecified dates the prosecution authorities instituted criminal proceedings against some of the beneficiaries of restitution in the Dospat region for document forgery and fraud.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003732897

Admin. suprême

31 août 1999

31 août 1999

applicant was arrested in New York (USA) and placed in detention on the basis of a extradition request from the authorities of the Netherlands Antilles where he had been charged with embezzlement and forgery

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD002462609

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

In 2009 a number of sets of criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant for, inter alia , forgery of documents, deception, credit-card fraud and misrepresentation on official documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC001130312

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2013

10 décembre 2013

He further stated that every photo produced by them was a forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0420JUD001231205

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2010

20 avril 2010

    In January 2002 the Second Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade charged the second applicant with forgery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1007JUD001051983

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 1988

7 octobre 1988

Depending on whether they are issued by one or more officials, they attest "the facts which they record" merely until "the contrary is proved" or until "forgery proceedings have been instituted" (Articles

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001344087

Admin. suprême

19 février 1991

19 février 1991

     On 8 February 1979 the Rome prosecuting authorities      issued an arrest warrant for forgery and corruption against      the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC004371898

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

its reasoning, the Disciplinary Court noted that in 1994 the applicant had assisted Mr K., a foreigner, who had been accused in criminal proceedings in Mannheim, of having acted as an accessory to forgery

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1809884-4105350

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2006

13 octobre 2006

  In November 1997 the applicant was detained on suspicion of forgery for which he was later convicted and served a prison sentence.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1922696-2029644

Admin. suprême

19 février 2007

19 février 2007

fair hearing), the applicant complains of the length and unfairness of the proceedings instituted after he had lodged a complaint and civil-party application against a colleague who had accused him of forgery

Source officielle