CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

59 099 résultats pour « Febbraro »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC003608002

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

Between 6 February 1998 and 3 March 2000 the (renamed) Ljubljana Local Court ( Okrajno sodišče v Ljubljani ) held six hearings.

Source officielle

Page 86 sur 2955

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111807

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2012

6 juin 2012

On 15 and 17 February 2012 the applicants were granted victim status in the criminal case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244127

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2025

11 juin 2025

France , no. 31446/12, §   59, 8   February 2018)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207994

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2021

22 janvier 2021

In February 2018 the first applicant went to Tajikistan to have his national passport renewed. Having received a new passport valid until February 2028, he returned to Russia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD007061713

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

  En l’affaire Ferrara et autres c.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0507JUD003104905

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2009

7 mai 2009

    On 9 February 2005 the applicant requested the court to resume the appeal proceedings since he had been summoned to the appeal hearing on 2   February 2005 belatedly. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD001572205

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

to attend the appeal hearing of 8 February 2005 and to comment on the submissions of the adverse party.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003760497

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

  On 8 January 1996 the applicant was summoned to appear in person at a hearing scheduled for 22 and 23 February.     On 21 February 1996 the applicant contacted Dr. Nordhus.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165531

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2016

7 juillet 2016

On 4 February 2003 the Town Department sent a letter to the applicant’s address in Murmansk informing him that a hearing would take place on 11   February 2003.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330JUD005418807

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2010

30 mars 2010

On 18 January 2010, served on the applicant's lawyer on 17 February 2010, the Federal Constitutional Court quashed the Munich Court of Appeal's decision of 25 February 2009 as far as it concerned the dismissal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD000941413

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2015

22 octobre 2015

On 7 February 2013 the Court refused the applicant’s request. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209783

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2021

16 avril 2021

    On 20 February 2021 the Moscow City Court examined the appeal against the Simonovskiy District Court’s judgment of 2 February 2021 and upheld it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC004982599

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2001

18 septembre 2001

the State Secretary’s decision of 1 February 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0915DEC006948101

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2005

15 septembre 2005

In February 2001 two persons, I. and B., submitted affidavits to the head of the Karabulak District Department of the Interior, where they stated that on 2 February 2000 Khadzhi-Murat Yandiyev had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC004538307

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

The applicant’s brother had therefore stayed at an unknown place after 24   February 2004 for several days.

Source officielle
CC

cr

6079a8b19ba5988459c4e954

Cassation

27 novembre 1968

27 novembre 1968

(LOUIS); 2° PASQUALINI (JEAN) ; 3° FERRERO (ELIE); 4° LUCIANI (PAUL), CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, DU 13 JUIN 1968 QUI, POUR AVOIR PROCURE L'EVASION D'UN DETENU ET FACILITE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110604

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2012

9 mars 2012

From 21 February 2008 until 23 February 2009 the applicant was detained in cell 90, which measured twelve square metres, had six sleeping places and accommodated nine detainees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139983

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2013

12 décembre 2013

Since then four decisions not to open criminal proceedings, dated 10   February 2007, 24   February 2007, 30   April 2007, and 11   May 2007, were adopted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202995

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2020

19 mars 2020

to be calculated for the period between 14 February 2014 and the date of entry into force of the judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118892

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2013

25 mars 2013

On 11 February 2009 the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on points of law lodged by the applicant.

Source officielle