CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

17 343 résultats pour « Delpy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0330JUD006029700

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2004

30 mars 2004

In particular, these delays cannot be considered significant in comparison to the overall length of the proceedings. 62.

Page 86 sur 868

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD000692403

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2007

14 juin 2007

or its continuation, or in compensation for damages for delay which had already occurred (see, mutatis mutandis , Camasso v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208JUD002559707

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

The court acknowledged the delay in the proceedings and stated that it was not attributable to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0225JUD003639507

Admin. suprême

25 février 2010

25 février 2010

    The applicant contested that he had been responsible for some delays to the proceedings, referring to V.'

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD006103916

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2021

15 avril 2021

There is no doubt that such a delay should be considered excessive and that the first-instance court was clearly responsible for it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1009JUD003567397

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2001

9 octobre 2001

However, the Court notes that Section 91 of the Courts Act does not apply to delays caused by the Public Prosecutor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD000814004

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

    The applicant maintained that the case was not complex and emphasised that there was a long delay before the Administrative Court. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0921JUD003808197

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2000

21 septembre 2000

He emphasises the stress imposed upon his wife and family by the uncertainty and delay, and the health consequences that they suffered. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0626JUD002639095

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2001

26 juin 2001

Any delay caused by Mr D.R.’s escape to Spain should not be counted against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD003421502

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2007

31 mai 2007

They further maintained that the scheduled hearings had been held without any interruptions and delays.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD001381306

Admin. suprême

4 février 2020

4 février 2020

The court considered invalid all the reasons cited by the debtor institution in justification of the delay in reinstatement of the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD002331004

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2009

30 avril 2009

Therefore, the Court may conclude she may be deemed responsible for four months’ delay.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0529JUD001517213

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2019

29 mai 2019

    as regards individual measures and considering the circumstances of the case, called upon the authorities, to ensure the applicant’s release without delay; 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC001993792

Admin. suprême

17 mai 1995

17 mai 1995

        The applicant argues that the cases against him were simple and that he was not responsible for any of the delays.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1201REP003345496

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 1998

1 décembre 1998

  It furthermore observes that no substantial delay seems to be imputable to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403DEC001437403

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2007

3 avril 2007

Moreover, the German courts are obliged to examine at any stage of the trial proceedings whether the unreasonable delay of the proceedings may justify a reduction of the sentence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0108DEC004337798

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2002

8 janvier 2002

  23 C 7/99-38) on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to show that he had suffered damage and that there was a causal link between any damage and undue delays in the proceedings concerning his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009DEC007415901

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2003

9 octobre 2003

jurisdiction will be transferred to the competent superior authority upon the party’s written request ( Devolutionsantrag ). ...This request has to be refused by the competent superior authority if the delay

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122DEC001704402

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2005

22 novembre 2005

He also complains of an alleged delay in the non-execution of the judgment in his favour. THE LAW A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228REP001993792

Admin. suprême

28 février 1996

28 février 1996

  The applicant submits that both cases were simple and that he was not responsible for any delays.

Source officielle