On 29 December 2000 the Constanţa Prosecutor’s Office indicted the applicant and sent his case for trial to the Constanţa Court of Appeal. 23.

  Chief Constable [1984] 1 W.L.R. 1358.

    The applicant submitted that in light of the Court’s constant case-law both respondent Governments had jurisdiction. 21.

    The applicant claimed 36,000 euros (EUR) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage. The Government considered the claim unsubstantiated. 85.

    Force est de constater qu’en l’espèce les versions des parties divergent de manière manifeste quant aux faits.

Il n'y constata aucune irrégularité. 18.

It has been the Court's constant approach that an applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interests (see, mutatis mutandis,

Due to constant attacks, in some of which his car and the apartment had been damaged, and the perpetrators of which had never been found, the applicant installed a camera outside his apartment. 1.

Duration Number of inmates per brigade Sq. m. per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

date Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m. per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well–established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Start and end date Duration Sq. m per inmate Specific grievances Domestic compensation awarded (in days) based on total period calculated domestically Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

The area where the applicants had allegedly entered Croatia had been under constant surveillance, including by stationary and thermographic cameras.

The applicant, through a valuer, assessed his damage at £150,000.00.

  Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicant 25,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 3,285 for costs and expenses.

Duration Inmates per brigade Sq. m. per inmate Number of toilets per brigade Specific grievances Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

name Date of birth   Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Other complaints under well-established case-law Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Representative name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth   Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Representative’s name and location Facility Start and end date Duration Sq. m. per inmate Specific grievances Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage