Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

Berger. Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 21 October 1999, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

The three coal-power plants have not yet been closed down and continue their activities. Relevant domestic law 1.

Many villagers had already been awarded compensation for the damage they had sustained. B.

They contended under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they had been deprived of their right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions since they had not been allowed to return to their village.

the said proceedings had been pending. 4.

In his decision the prosecutor referred to a decision not to prosecute that had been given on 16 July 2001, in which similar complaints had already been examined and found to be unsubstantiated. 17.

Bülent Zengin, est un ressortissant turc, né en 1975 et résidant à Berne (Suisse). A.

2008 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicants, Mr   Hasan   Bayar and Mr   Ali   Gürbüz, are Turkish nationals, who were born in   1982 and   1971 respectively and live in Bern

, section C n° 216, 227, 231, 305, 312, 314, 319, 321, 322 et 323, section C n° 218, lieudit Lou Touron, section C n° 0246 et 0391, lieudit Bataille, commune d'Arthez de Béarn, section C n° 250, 273, 532

    On 28 May 1998 the applicants argued before the court that their police statements had been extracted under torture.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;   3.

    Accordingly, the Court concludes that there has been a violation of Article   6 § 1 of the Convention. 26.

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;   3.     Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;   4.

They further allege under the same heading that as a juvenile he should not have been kept detained in an ordinary prison.

As regards the merits of the complaint the Government submit that the criminal proceedings had been complex, as they involved numerous single charges, some of which only had been discovered in the course

However, they had proved ineffective in that the facilities had repeatedly been repaired, to no avail.

    Accordingly, there has been no violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention.

However, her case had been dismissed by the national courts.